General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney 6/13/2011: Federal Disaster Relief For Tornado & Flood Victims Is ‘Immoral,’ ‘Makes No Sense'
With Romney heading to Louisiana today to pretend that he cares about the hurricane victims, it's important to remember this statement from a debate on June 13 of last year:
From ThinkProgress, 6/14/2011:
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/06/14/244973/mitt-romney-federal-disaster-relief-for-tornado-and-flood-victims-is-immoral-makes-no-sense-at-all/
Mitt Romney: Federal Disaster Relief For Tornado And Flood Victims Is Immoral, Makes No Sense At All
Asked about federal disaster relief for recent tornado and flood victims at last nights GOP debate, candidate Mitt Romney called the spending immoral and said the Federal Emergency Management Agency should be privatized. With greenhouse pollution on the rise, the United States has been struck by a punishing series of billion-dollar disasters.
Embracing a radical anti-government ideology from the most extreme elements of the Tea Party, Romney said that the victims in Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee, Massachusetts, and other communities hit by tornadoes and flooding should not receive governmental assistance. He argued it is simply immoral for there to be deficit spending that could harm future generations:Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, thats the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, thats even better. (...) We cannot we cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids. It is simply immoral, in my view, for us to continue to rack up larger and larger debts and pass them on to our kids, knowing full well that well all be dead and gone before its paid off. It makes no sense at all.
-snip-
Video at the link. Romney made this point even with the debate moderator emphasizing that he was talking about disaster relief.
From the CNN debate transcript:
http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1106/13/se.02.html
KING: What else, Governor Romney? You've been a chief executive of a state. I was just in Joplin, Missouri. I've been in Mississippi and Louisiana and Tennessee and other communities dealing with whether it's the tornadoes, the flooding, and worse. FEMA is about to run out of money, and there are some people who say do it on a case-by-case basis and some people who say, you know, maybe we're learning a lesson here that the states should take on more of this role. How do you deal with something like that?
ROMNEY: Absolutely. Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better.
Instead of thinking in the federal budget, what we should cut -- we should ask ourselves the opposite question. What should we keep? We should take all of what we're doing at the federal level and say, what are the things we're doing that we don't have to do? And those things we've got to stop doing, because we're borrowing $1.6 trillion more this year than we're taking in. We cannot...
KING: Including disaster relief, though?
ROMNEY: We cannot -- we cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids. It is simply immoral, in my view, for us to continue to rack up larger and larger debts and pass them on to our kids, knowing full well that we'll all be dead and gone before it's paid off. It makes no sense at all.
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)couldn't have a jeopardized future ever...unless a massive earthquake swallowed up the entire US.
catbyte
(34,372 posts)it could happen.
randome
(34,845 posts)Man, that one was easy to dispose of.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)highplainsdem
(48,966 posts)jsmirman
(4,507 posts)it really goes with the point I was trying to make in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021228783
(There could be no greater repudiation of Paul Ryan (and Ayn Rand) than Hurricane Isaac)
highplainsdem
(48,966 posts)jsmirman
(4,507 posts)fast-moving board today - but I think it's an important point.
The rescues are such a wonderful counterpoint to the every man is an island selfishness bullshit of Ryan/Rand.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)where we would no longer be there for each other in times of adversity. "Are you flooded? Too bad, so sad. Deal. Not our problem."
highplainsdem
(48,966 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)highplainsdem
(48,966 posts)Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)living in Schoharie County in Upstate NY that suffered so much from the flooding from both Irene and Lee, the Teabaggers here are going to vote with Rmoney and the Representative that voted no aid unless it came from Joplin, Mo's needs. F*cking idiots!!