Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

triron

(21,998 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2019, 11:04 PM Aug 2019

Esquire: We're supposed to believe that the Russians hacked into voting systems but did nothing...

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a28517486/russia-hack-election-systems-all-50-states/

"Remember when we were all told that it was only a couple of precincts, then a couple of cities, then a couple of states? Remember when it was just data? Now, as far as we can read between the blacked-out lines, we are being asked to believe that the Russian ratfckers could have deleted "voter data," that they "were in a position" to jack around with it, but, having achieved this monumental intelligence triumph, they didn't do anything with it?"
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Esquire: We're supposed to believe that the Russians hacked into voting systems but did nothing... (Original Post) triron Aug 2019 OP
ITTMFA Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2019 #1
Why would they go to all that trouble, Cracklin Charlie Aug 2019 #2
Two entirely separate systems. Ms. Toad Aug 2019 #7
K & R Duppers Aug 2019 #3
knr triron Aug 2019 #4
Common sense would say they got in the computers for a reason, not just to look. shraby Aug 2019 #5
Since many of these attacks seem to have occurred and were detected well before the election, hughee99 Aug 2019 #6
But wasn't it up to states to take action. Sewa Aug 2019 #8
That was practice, just warming up. triron Aug 2019 #9
The reports I've heard are about hacking, or attempts, hughee99 Aug 2019 #19
Did you miss the news about Sewa Sep 2019 #22
I did see that. It's not the same thing. hughee99 Sep 2019 #23
Putin spent all that time, money, and effort to gain access Botany Aug 2019 #10
+1. He instructed the Russian government to help Trump win. dalton99a Aug 2019 #16
I've always believed they changed actual vote totals. BannonsLiver Aug 2019 #11
The exit polls had HRC winning. Botany Aug 2019 #13
Yes. That's exactly why the public will remain in the dark. triron Aug 2019 #20
A thief doesn't break into The Louvre just to look at the pretty paintings.... Talitha Aug 2019 #12
On election day in 2016, how many people who could have, should have voted for Clinton elocs Aug 2019 #14
People have the right to vote or not vote in this country. former9thward Aug 2019 #15
People who chose not to vote or voted 3rd party elocs Aug 2019 #17
Yes or the rolleyes crew will post 20 emojis rolling eyes indicating your a CT nut uponit7771 Aug 2019 #18
I expect this. Just try to ignore it . triron Aug 2019 #21
We are so fcked Hekate Sep 2019 #24
K&R ck4829 Sep 2019 #25
Analogy: Like a burglar who breaks into your house to admire the Chippendale furniture. no_hypocrisy Sep 2019 #26
Any Russian agent worth his salt would have procon Sep 2019 #27
The first fuck up was not demanding a new election from day one ecstatic Sep 2019 #28
They also hacked into our power grid, supposedly to "look around." GoCubsGo Sep 2019 #29

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
2. Why would they go to all that trouble,
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 01:13 AM
Aug 2019

And then NOT rig the vote? Makes no sense, to me.

They would need to win to make the crimes go unpunished.

Ms. Toad

(34,060 posts)
7. Two entirely separate systems.
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 03:20 PM
Aug 2019

They certainly could have indirectly influenced the vote by removing eligible voters from the roster.

Although a friend of mine who works in a local board of elections indicates that would ahve been detected because of frequent back-ups (which are saved in physicaly and electronically isolated media). Anyone who goes to the polls and says they are a registered voter is entitled to cast a provisional ballot. All provisional ballots are reviewed to determine if the voter is actually eligible. That review includes reviewing the existing file - and the separately stored back-up files. In doing so they would have discovered the unauthorized removal - and probably more (unless they ony removed 1-2 per jurisdiction, in which case an isolated removal might not be thought to be part of a pattern).

That said - caring for the integrity of the voter registration data is at least a state decision, and potentially a local precinct decision. It may be that not all jurisdictions have the same processes in place.

In addition, not everyone who is told (or perhaps isn't told) they can cast a provisional ballot will do so. If they don't cast a provisional ballot there will be no subsequent review.

So - it is certainly possible that the Russians indirectly influenced the vote. But all of the reports of Russian infiltration of the "voting system" are limited to the voter registration system, not the voting system. They are two entirely separate systems.

Reporting on this matter is very sloppy. Here is a perfect example:

It concluded that while there is no evidence that any votes were changed in actual voting machines, “Russian cyberactors were in a position to delete or change voter data” in the Illinois voter database.


Being in position to change voter data is completley unrelated to being in postion to change votes, yet the two are paired in the same sentence as if the ablity to do one implied the ability to do the other.

And readers who are not regularly engaged in election work do not necessarily understand the distinction and make the same leap of logic that you were encuraged by the article to do.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
5. Common sense would say they got in the computers for a reason, not just to look.
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 01:56 PM
Aug 2019

My guess it was to jigger enough votes in strategic places to toss the election they way they wanted it to go.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
6. Since many of these attacks seem to have occurred and were detected well before the election,
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 03:02 PM
Aug 2019

I'm skeptical about how much access they would have had to actual votes that had not yet been cast.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
19. The reports I've heard are about hacking, or attempts,
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 10:36 PM
Aug 2019

Before the election. Haven’t heard any reports about it happening during or after, not have I heard any with evidence anyone actually altered vote totals. I do recall several politicians before the election saying that no serious person would suggest this was even possible.

Sewa

(1,255 posts)
22. Did you miss the news about
Sun Sep 1, 2019, 01:21 AM
Sep 2019

The company that supplies the the software for voting machines was hacked. Do you believe Trump admission wants all the information out in the public domain. Oh yeah a big thank you to Winner for leaking this information.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
23. I did see that. It's not the same thing.
Sun Sep 1, 2019, 02:04 AM
Sep 2019

To say that the company that supplies the software was hacked isn't the same thing as saying the voting machines were hacked, and suggesting that there aren't stories about voting hacks and altered votes because Trump suppressed it is mere speculation. I'm not saying it couldn't have happened (as some people suggested prior to the election), I'm just saying I haven't seen any evidence that it did happen.

Botany

(70,489 posts)
10. Putin spent all that time, money, and effort to gain access
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 06:14 PM
Aug 2019

... to the hardware and software of our voting machines, central tabulators, and voter d-bases but did nothing with that information?

dalton99a

(81,450 posts)
16. +1. He instructed the Russian government to help Trump win.
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 07:37 PM
Aug 2019

It's logical to assume every action taken had that goal in mind.


BannonsLiver

(16,369 posts)
11. I've always believed they changed actual vote totals.
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 06:16 PM
Aug 2019

We (the public) would not be told if that were the case.

What happened in Nov. 2016 was infinitely more dangerous than anything that happened on 9/11 but because nothing is blowing up and nobody is getting killed it does not carry the same “wow” factor with the media.

Talitha

(6,582 posts)
12. A thief doesn't break into The Louvre just to look at the pretty paintings....
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 06:38 PM
Aug 2019

Do they think we're as stupid as trumpanzees?

elocs

(22,566 posts)
14. On election day in 2016, how many people who could have, should have voted for Clinton
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 07:01 PM
Aug 2019

chose to do nothing, or voted 3rd party?
No Russian interference is required for that.
Or should they be blameless?

former9thward

(31,979 posts)
15. People have the right to vote or not vote in this country.
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 07:33 PM
Aug 2019

And they have the right to vote for 3rd parties if they wish. No one is owed a vote. Democrats never complain when the libertarians or similar groups run candidates. Multiple parties are part of the system and always will be. We have to run candidates who can inspire enough voters to give them enough to votes to create an electoral vote victory.

elocs

(22,566 posts)
17. People who chose not to vote or voted 3rd party
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 07:38 PM
Aug 2019

helped to elect Trump and they have no right to whine about it now because they are getting just what they deserve although millions of others are not.

Like it or not, the reality is that ours is a 2 party system and the winner of nearly every election will be either the Democratic candidate or the Republican one. This is not a difficult concept to grasp.
If too many on the Left choose to do this again in 2020 it will only help to reelect Trump.

procon

(15,805 posts)
27. Any Russian agent worth his salt would have
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 07:53 AM
Sep 2019

lift behind a secret backdoor in every computer network they were able to hack into. Once they had free access what was stopping them from sending off an army of malware bots to every other computer system connected to the original point of entry.

From that point any hacker could easily insert nasty little snippets of code that would wait in hiding until a certain date, event or instruction activated their killer worm to wake up and do their preset tasks.

Americans have little idea what may happen when computers are infected with malware code. Public officials have largely taken the ostrich approach and their deliberate ignorance, outright denial, and blasé faire attitude has put the çountry at grave risk.

ecstatic

(32,681 posts)
28. The first fuck up was not demanding a new election from day one
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:01 AM
Sep 2019

Of these reports. The other side would have done it for sure. SMH. Going forward, we're going to have to be a little more aggressive and ruthless or we're not going to survive.

GoCubsGo

(32,079 posts)
29. They also hacked into our power grid, supposedly to "look around."
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:08 AM
Sep 2019

You know damn well they messed with that, as well. Can't wait to see what kind of time bombs they set there. Gawd, or whomever help us.

Why the hell either the power grid or the election systems are connected to the Internet, and not stand-alone, is beyond me. What fucking idiots thought this was a good idea????

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Esquire: We're supposed ...