General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEsquire: We're supposed to believe that the Russians hacked into voting systems but did nothing...
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a28517486/russia-hack-election-systems-all-50-states/"Remember when we were all told that it was only a couple of precincts, then a couple of cities, then a couple of states? Remember when it was just data? Now, as far as we can read between the blacked-out lines, we are being asked to believe that the Russian ratfckers could have deleted "voter data," that they "were in a position" to jack around with it, but, having achieved this monumental intelligence triumph, they didn't do anything with it?"
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,321 posts)And take Moscow Mitch with him.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)And then NOT rig the vote? Makes no sense, to me.
They would need to win to make the crimes go unpunished.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)They certainly could have indirectly influenced the vote by removing eligible voters from the roster.
Although a friend of mine who works in a local board of elections indicates that would ahve been detected because of frequent back-ups (which are saved in physicaly and electronically isolated media). Anyone who goes to the polls and says they are a registered voter is entitled to cast a provisional ballot. All provisional ballots are reviewed to determine if the voter is actually eligible. That review includes reviewing the existing file - and the separately stored back-up files. In doing so they would have discovered the unauthorized removal - and probably more (unless they ony removed 1-2 per jurisdiction, in which case an isolated removal might not be thought to be part of a pattern).
That said - caring for the integrity of the voter registration data is at least a state decision, and potentially a local precinct decision. It may be that not all jurisdictions have the same processes in place.
In addition, not everyone who is told (or perhaps isn't told) they can cast a provisional ballot will do so. If they don't cast a provisional ballot there will be no subsequent review.
So - it is certainly possible that the Russians indirectly influenced the vote. But all of the reports of Russian infiltration of the "voting system" are limited to the voter registration system, not the voting system. They are two entirely separate systems.
Reporting on this matter is very sloppy. Here is a perfect example:
Being in position to change voter data is completley unrelated to being in postion to change votes, yet the two are paired in the same sentence as if the ablity to do one implied the ability to do the other.
And readers who are not regularly engaged in election work do not necessarily understand the distinction and make the same leap of logic that you were encuraged by the article to do.
shraby
(21,946 posts)My guess it was to jigger enough votes in strategic places to toss the election they way they wanted it to go.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)I'm skeptical about how much access they would have had to actual votes that had not yet been cast.
Sewa
(1,255 posts)Didnt FL ignore warnings
triron
(21,998 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)Before the election. Havent heard any reports about it happening during or after, not have I heard any with evidence anyone actually altered vote totals. I do recall several politicians before the election saying that no serious person would suggest this was even possible.
Sewa
(1,255 posts)The company that supplies the the software for voting machines was hacked. Do you believe Trump admission wants all the information out in the public domain. Oh yeah a big thank you to Winner for leaking this information.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)To say that the company that supplies the software was hacked isn't the same thing as saying the voting machines were hacked, and suggesting that there aren't stories about voting hacks and altered votes because Trump suppressed it is mere speculation. I'm not saying it couldn't have happened (as some people suggested prior to the election), I'm just saying I haven't seen any evidence that it did happen.
Botany
(70,489 posts)... to the hardware and software of our voting machines, central tabulators, and voter d-bases but did nothing with that information?
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)It's logical to assume every action taken had that goal in mind.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)We (the public) would not be told if that were the case.
What happened in Nov. 2016 was infinitely more dangerous than anything that happened on 9/11 but because nothing is blowing up and nobody is getting killed it does not carry the same wow factor with the media.
Botany
(70,489 posts)N/t
triron
(21,998 posts)Talitha
(6,582 posts)Do they think we're as stupid as trumpanzees?
elocs
(22,566 posts)chose to do nothing, or voted 3rd party?
No Russian interference is required for that.
Or should they be blameless?
former9thward
(31,979 posts)And they have the right to vote for 3rd parties if they wish. No one is owed a vote. Democrats never complain when the libertarians or similar groups run candidates. Multiple parties are part of the system and always will be. We have to run candidates who can inspire enough voters to give them enough to votes to create an electoral vote victory.
elocs
(22,566 posts)helped to elect Trump and they have no right to whine about it now because they are getting just what they deserve although millions of others are not.
Like it or not, the reality is that ours is a 2 party system and the winner of nearly every election will be either the Democratic candidate or the Republican one. This is not a difficult concept to grasp.
If too many on the Left choose to do this again in 2020 it will only help to reelect Trump.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)triron
(21,998 posts)Hekate
(90,643 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,080 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)lift behind a secret backdoor in every computer network they were able to hack into. Once they had free access what was stopping them from sending off an army of malware bots to every other computer system connected to the original point of entry.
From that point any hacker could easily insert nasty little snippets of code that would wait in hiding until a certain date, event or instruction activated their killer worm to wake up and do their preset tasks.
Americans have little idea what may happen when computers are infected with malware code. Public officials have largely taken the ostrich approach and their deliberate ignorance, outright denial, and blasé faire attitude has put the çountry at grave risk.
ecstatic
(32,681 posts)Of these reports. The other side would have done it for sure. SMH. Going forward, we're going to have to be a little more aggressive and ruthless or we're not going to survive.
GoCubsGo
(32,079 posts)You know damn well they messed with that, as well. Can't wait to see what kind of time bombs they set there. Gawd, or whomever help us.
Why the hell either the power grid or the election systems are connected to the Internet, and not stand-alone, is beyond me. What fucking idiots thought this was a good idea????