Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,600 posts)
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 01:24 AM Aug 2019

Sacklers vs. States: Settlement Talks Stumble Over Foreign Business

Sacklers vs. States: Settlement Talks Stumble Over Foreign Business

The Sackler family is willing to give up Purdue Pharma to settle all claims related to the opioid crisis, but is resisting a quick sale of its overseas drug company.

By Matthew Goldstein, Danny Hakim and Jan Hoffman at the NY Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/30/health/purdue-sacklers-opioids-settlement.html?action=click&module=Latest&pgtype=Homepage

"SNIP......


Purdue Pharma’s negotiations to settle thousands of lawsuits over the company’s role in the opioids crisis have turned into a standoff between members of the Sackler family, who own the company, and a group of state attorneys general over how much the family should pay and whether it can continue selling drugs abroad.

The Sacklers are deep in negotiations that, if finalized, would force them to give up ownership of Purdue, the company widely blamed for the onset of the opioid epidemic with its aggressive marketing of the prescription painkiller OxyContin. But they want to keep selling OxyContin and other drugs abroad for as many as seven more years, through another company they own, Mundipharma, based in Cambridge, England.

Some attorneys general, particularly in wealthier states like New York, Massachusetts and Connecticut, are resisting that and other issues related to the foreign business.

“Connecticut demands that the Sacklers and Purdue management be forced completely out of the opioid business, domestically and internationally, and that they never be allowed to return,” said Attorney General William Tong of Connecticut.


......SNIP"

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sacklers vs. States: Settlement Talks Stumble Over Foreign Business (Original Post) applegrove Aug 2019 OP
Reminds me of a Jon Stewart sketch where Mandvi went to Aspestos applegrove Aug 2019 #1
The current offer is clearly not sufficient Gothmog Aug 2019 #2
Their money has been hidden away completely in the last 10-15 years FakeNoose Aug 2019 #3

applegrove

(118,600 posts)
1. Reminds me of a Jon Stewart sketch where Mandvi went to Aspestos
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 01:39 AM
Aug 2019

Last edited Sat Aug 31, 2019, 02:39 AM - Edit history (1)

Quebec to ask them who they were selling to. It was somewhere in Asia. This is as bad.

Gothmog

(145,097 posts)
2. The current offer is clearly not sufficient
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 01:07 PM
Aug 2019

Last edited Sat Aug 31, 2019, 05:32 PM - Edit history (1)

The Sacklers need to return all of the blood money earned due to their actions

FakeNoose

(32,624 posts)
3. Their money has been hidden away completely in the last 10-15 years
Sat Aug 31, 2019, 01:14 PM
Aug 2019

I'd be surprised if anyone in the Sackler family is still living in the US. Whoever is left here knows the score, and the government can't get money that it can't find. The lawyers and accountants have already done their work. Maybe the company goes belly up, but their $ billions are safe.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sacklers vs. States: Sett...