Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
1. Nope
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 04:45 PM
Aug 2012

Not possible to have a "non-partisan" president without doing away with political partisanship. The only "non-partisan" president was George Washington.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
3. The only one who came even close in the last hundred years was Ike
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 04:48 PM
Aug 2012

and he had his partisan moments. But everyone respected him because of his accomplishments in WW II.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. I was just gonna say Ike.
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:23 PM
Aug 2012

He got elected by promising to end the Korean war. I wonder if another candidate comes along perhaps in 2016 and promises to end the wars we are in and bring in peace, if that person could accomplish that.

demosincebirth

(12,536 posts)
11. He once said that his worse mistake was appointing Gov Earl Warren (Ca) as Chief Justice of the
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:50 PM
Aug 2012

Supreme Court.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
4. That was what Obama tried to be after he was sworn in
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 04:49 PM
Aug 2012

It not only energized the opposition who saw him as weak for trying, it alienated his own base that worked to get him elected.

I imagine it could be possible sometime in the future, but not in this polarized environment.

Green_Lantern

(2,423 posts)
7. on policy he may have tried to work with them but still...
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:14 PM
Aug 2012

Any success would've been seen as a victory for Democrats.

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
5. I would argue that things are NOT partisan ENOUGH!...
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 04:55 PM
Aug 2012

Consider the views of a lot of right winger nut bags. Ban all abortion, huge increase in racist policies, cut social programs for the poor, no healthcare for the poor, no education for the poor, even laxer gun laws, constitutional ban on gar marriage. Are these the kind of views that we really want to be compromising with? IMHO there really needs to be a viable electable LEFT wing counterpart in the US. Obama is centre right/left at best. He still represents big business far too often and compromises accordingly.

The right wing has elected president after president with a "fuck you I'm doing what my base wants and there's shit all you can do about it" attitude. You know what? They have been successful. This is one page I wish the left would take from the rights playbook. The US needs a strong left president that gets shit done for once!

Green_Lantern

(2,423 posts)
6. you are basically saying the Right is too partisan then..
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:10 PM
Aug 2012

Which I agree.

But everything you described is just ideological differences.

The two sides in US politics are ideologically more alike now than when it was Goldwater vs. LBJ yet the parties are very divided.

Even Republicans who normally may like Obama's policies hate him because he's a Democrat.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
10. I agree.
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:26 PM
Aug 2012

We need a real liberal in the FDR model to save our country. We could have had a person like that in Howard Dean, but the real powers behind the curtain wouldn't have it and made sure that he would be made to look like a looney.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
8. Partisanship has polluted the process to the point of no-return
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:17 PM
Aug 2012

It would take a real leader who isn't controlled by special interests. Someone truly inspiring.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it possible to have a ...