Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RKP5637

(67,088 posts)
Sun Sep 8, 2019, 08:54 PM Sep 2019

Study finds a link between infectious diseases and racism in the United States

https://www.psypost.org/2019/09/study-finds-a-link-between-infectious-diseases-and-racism-in-the-united-states-54413

New research published in the scientific journal Social Psychological and Personality Science provides evidence that the prevalence of infectious diseases plays an important role in racial prejudices across the United States.

The findings support the parasite-stress hypothesis, which holds that people exposed to diseases become more likely to adopt anti-pathogen behavioral strategies — such as avoiding and expressing more negative attitudes toward groups with dissimilar features.

“I was surprised when a 2015 study found an association between exposure to black Americans and racial prejudice, such that white individuals living in U.S. states with more black people showed increased prejudice towards this group,” said study author Brian A. O’Shea, a EU Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska Curie Global Fellow based in the Psychology Department at both Harvard University and the University of Amsterdam.

“The finding was counter to the extensive literature showing that contact with outgroups actually reduces prejudice. I suspected that the study was showing a spurious correlation and that perhaps infectious diseases might better explain variation in racial prejudice across the U.S. This epiphany likely occurred because I was lucky enough to have an office beside Corey Fincher while at Warwick University, who developed Parasite Stress theory, along with Randy Thornhill.”

In their study, the researchers utilized 2006-2013 data from Harvard’s Project Implicit website, a nonprofit organization that collects data about people’s automatic, or implicit, attitudes toward different groups as well as their explicit biases.

The study found “that at the aggregated group level, regions with more infectious diseases are likely to have higher intergroup racial tensions,” O’Shea told PsyPost.

“Specifically, we found that if you’re a white or black person living in a U.S. state with more infectious diseases, you have a stronger feeling in favor of your in-group and/or a stronger opposition to your out-group, both consciously and unconsciously.”

“These effects occur even if we control for individual factors like age, political ideology, religious belief, education and gender, and a number of state-level factors, including median income, inequality, race exposure and more. Importantly, even within areas with high infectious diseases, there is substantial individual variation in prejudice,” O’Shea explained.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study finds a link between infectious diseases and racism in the United States (Original Post) RKP5637 Sep 2019 OP
sounds like someone trying to make racism sound reasonable. lol demigoddess Sep 2019 #1
Or excusable ... I don't buy it all. ... some of it, but not all of it. n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #2
I guess I'd call this presentation "Babble-Speak" and it reminds me of a sociology abqtommy Sep 2019 #3
Well thought out! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #6
Thanks... I do try and sometimes succeed! abqtommy Sep 2019 #7
Basic group psychology... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #4
Yep!!! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #5

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
3. I guess I'd call this presentation "Babble-Speak" and it reminds me of a sociology
Sun Sep 8, 2019, 09:33 PM
Sep 2019

class I took in college where a lot of common-sense ideas were dressed up in proprietary language to the extent of making them nearly unidentifiable. Yes, there is prejudice. Duh! Yes, there is "substantial individual variation in prejudice." Duh!

I try to restrict a broad application of ethnic/cultural prejudice. It's not healthy or productive to make judgments according to skin color, gender or age. I've been rewarded by finding out that 99% of the people I meet I consider to be supportive or at least neutral toward me. That leaves 1% to narrow into a firm prejudice that I base on behavior, based on my judgment.

My in-group/in-crowd is much like me. My out-group/out-crowd would be white supremacists and nazis and the like. But within those groups they are their in-group and I'm their out-group.

I accept that it's ok to hate the hate/haters so I suppose it's fair to say it's ok for them to hate me. Sometimes we can only do so much but we can use clear language. Hate is not productive or desirable in a healthy society. Psychological experiments have proven that healthy groups and individuals are accepting and supportive. I'll go along with that.

I also admit to some strong food prejudices but we can leave that discussion for another time.

Wounded Bear

(58,605 posts)
4. Basic group psychology...
Sun Sep 8, 2019, 09:42 PM
Sep 2019

in times of stress, people tend to close ranks with their "in group" and want to isolate from who they think of as "the other."

Infectious disease is just one manifestation of this syndrome. Econmomic stress, upticks in public violence, there are other stressors that would trigger racism and ethnic exclusion.

It takes conscious effort to counter act that, because it is ingrained into our psyches from thousands of years of antropology.

It's called becoming more civilized and rational.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study finds a link betwee...