Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,981 posts)
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 12:06 PM Sep 2019

??-McCabe Legal Team:"it is clear that NO INDICTMENT has been returned" against McCabe by grand jury

Just in: Andrew McCabe’s legal team says in a new letter to Jesse Liu that based on their conversations with the US Attorney’s office in DC yesterday, “it is clear that no indictment has been returned” against McCabe by the grand jury.











23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
??-McCabe Legal Team:"it is clear that NO INDICTMENT has been returned" against McCabe by grand jury (Original Post) kpete Sep 2019 OP
We have always been told you can get an indictment for a ham sandwich. DURHAM D Sep 2019 #1
I was going to say it wasn't tasty exboyfil Sep 2019 #9
Damn, I was going there - GMTA Brother Buzz Sep 2019 #10
It's easy as hell to get an indictment. bearsfootball516 Sep 2019 #2
From what I have heard ScratchCat Sep 2019 #5
Also, How Do These Laws/Policy DallasNE Sep 2019 #12
A guest on Maddow last night mentioned how rare it is Flaleftist Sep 2019 #8
A middle finger salute to the Trump-Barr "Injustice" Dept. from the GJ TruckFump Sep 2019 #3
Ironic, is it not, Cirque du So-What Sep 2019 #4
Right now, 64k question. Will Barr resubmit to a new Grand Jury? Ninga Sep 2019 #6
Impeach Barr and the Con malaise Sep 2019 #7
Simultaneously Kid Berwyn Sep 2019 #11
The NYTimes' title is less deceptive FBaggins Sep 2019 #13
Good - Barr is testing the waters for a Hillary indictment lame54 Sep 2019 #14
The question would be whom would they indict? gordianot Sep 2019 #15
Hillary was his campaign promise lame54 Sep 2019 #23
This is just like the Steele Dossier has been proven... Botany Sep 2019 #16
red don and his pet toad not fooled Sep 2019 #17
Trump would be killed in discovery Pantagruel Sep 2019 #18
Why? FBaggins Sep 2019 #22
I think was just a distraction from the impeachment vote & $1 trillion deficit. CaptainTruth Sep 2019 #19
Am I the only one who wants an indictment because it will open all government files TeamPooka Sep 2019 #20
Vindictive Barr! True Blue American Sep 2019 #21

ScratchCat

(1,980 posts)
5. From what I have heard
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 12:17 PM
Sep 2019

Its more about the fact that what McCabe was alleged to have done almost always results in a termination of their employment rather than criminal charges. He leaked something he wasn't supposed to have leaked which simply involved the existence of an investigation. Then, he didn't tell the 100% truth to the IG. Career, high level employees of DOJ and similar agencies almost never get prosecuted "by the letter of the law" for these types of things. Further, his "violations" may have simply been of DOJ policy rather than Federal statute.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
12. Also, How Do These Laws/Policy
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 02:26 PM
Sep 2019

Interact with whistleblower laws. Wasn't his leak to counteract government misinformation?

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
8. A guest on Maddow last night mentioned how rare it is
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 12:21 PM
Sep 2019

for them to not be able to get an indictment. IIRC, he said 5 out of tens of thousands were turned down last year.

TruckFump

(5,812 posts)
3. A middle finger salute to the Trump-Barr "Injustice" Dept. from the GJ
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 12:14 PM
Sep 2019

Fuck 'em, and feed 'em peanuts...assuming no indictment came down.

To not get an indictment out of a Grand Jury? What an embarrassment.

Cirque du So-What

(25,921 posts)
4. Ironic, is it not,
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 12:16 PM
Sep 2019

that the blowhard who uttered the phrase 'witch hunt' hundreds of times in regards to his own malfeasance, is now initiating real witch hunts against his perceived political enemies?;

FBaggins

(26,727 posts)
13. The NYTimes' title is less deceptive
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 02:27 PM
Sep 2019

This one can leave the reader with the impression that we know that charges were rejected. That they voted a "no true bill"

In reality, we just know that no indictment was reported. But that's true of when the same grand jury met months ago. We don't know whether or not indictments were presented to the GJ for approval.

The letter was merely asking DOJ whether it had happened. We can't assume from this that it did happen.

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
15. The question would be whom would they indict?
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 02:39 PM
Sep 2019

It would be ultimate irony if they went for Comey and Clinton. I put nothing past this bunch.

Botany

(70,483 posts)
16. This is just like the Steele Dossier has been proven...
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 02:40 PM
Sep 2019

... false or the Mueller report exonerated Trump false memes produced by Fox/Trump/the right in order to distract from the truth.

McCabe was doing his job. End of story.

Btw "they" don't really want a trial where McCabe speaks in court and his lawyers can subpoena team Trump.

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
17. red don and his pet toad
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 02:41 PM
Sep 2019

barr still got some mileage out of this in terms of intimidating the criminal gang's perceived enemies and investigators.

FBaggins

(26,727 posts)
22. Why?
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 06:24 PM
Sep 2019

It wouldn’t be a civil trial and the presumed charges have little to nothing to do with Trump.

CaptainTruth

(6,582 posts)
19. I think was just a distraction from the impeachment vote & $1 trillion deficit.
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 02:54 PM
Sep 2019

Impeachment vote news came out. A couple hours later the $1 trillion deficit news came out. Then it seemed like within an hour or two, "McCabe indicted" (maybe indicted?) news came out.

TeamPooka

(24,217 posts)
20. Am I the only one who wants an indictment because it will open all government files
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 03:01 PM
Sep 2019

to his defense on his persecution and the rationale behind it. yeah, I spelled that right.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»??-McCabe Legal Team:"it ...