Should there be a bi-cameral, bi-partisan meeting between the Democratic and Republican leaders?

[kentuck]

The meeting could be called by either Party in the name of "National Security".

Each Party should address their concerns to the Committee of the Whole?

This is a matter of the highest importance.

Is there no one to facilitate such a request?

[unblock]

1. We shouldn't negotiate with terrorists

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

2. Seriously? You think Moscow Mitch would allow such a thing?

[Sneederbunk]

3. Nyet!

[spanone]

4. republicans appear satisfied with the status quo.

[leftieNanner]

5. A very good idea, except

You are assuming that there are enough sensible and thoughtful individuals on the other side of the aisle who would make this a worthwhile endeavor. Think about the looney tunes (lookin' at you Gym Jordan) people who believe the Fox BS and bring it to work with them.

If it were possible, it might make a difference. Moscow Mitch is thriving on this chaos, because it hides what he is really doing.

So my answer to your question is no. Sadly.

[Wounded Bear]

6. There should be, but I doubt there will be...

For all the bothsiderism rampant in the press these days, it's the Repubs who have refused to compromise.

[LastDemocratInSC]

7. It's called the Senate and it's a shame that an alternative must be considered for such basic things

[kentuck]

8. So we mustn't try?

Because we know it is going to fail?

Because we should never have to look back and say we didn't even try?

[abqtommy]

9. Given the proven corruption of all reTHUGS I think

that there are better areas to focus our energy on, like IMPEACHMENT!

[TeamPooka]

10. Maybe They can discuss that stolen supreme court seat