General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVP Biden threatened to withhold $$ from Ukraine until they removed a corrupt prosecutor
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the General Discussion forum).
People need to know what the facts are when Trump tried to make a false equivalency.
VP Biden *did* threaten to withhold support.
Trump is trying to make it seem as though what they did was identical, the only difference being that they disagree on which side is corrupt.
If we've learned anything from the 2016 election, it should be to face the lies and throw the facts back at them just as loudly. They win when we assume everyone knows what the truth is.
The grain of truth in the lie is what gives power to the lie. We must confront it.
So, in this case, get familiar with how the two stories differ. The corrupt prosecutor (Viktor Shokin) is key to the story.
Here's the best link I've seen so far. Please add more.
https://www.justsecurity.org/66101/trump-and-giulianis-quest-for-fake-ukraine-dirt-on-biden-an-explainer/
duforsure
(11,885 posts)To use like trumps using Barr here now, and Biden with many others from other countries and groups wanted this very corrupt prosecutor removed from office.
FBaggins
(26,721 posts)The corrupt prosecutor was going after a company that paid his son large amounts of money. There's no way to avoid the appearance of impropriety there. It's very likely that there was nothing to it at all... but it still smells - and was a mistake to brag about it.
intrepidity
(7,275 posts)I agree that Hunter should have stayed away. I'm convinced he didn't do anything wrong, but certain people with high-profile names should resist the temptation to sit on Boards.... unfortunately, that is so ingrained in business these days.
emulatorloo
(44,071 posts)FBaggins
(26,721 posts)What part of what I posted was false?
emulatorloo
(44,071 posts)The corrupt prosecutor was going after a company that paid his son large amounts of money. There's no way to avoid the appearance of impropriety there.
Thats not the full truth, there are several articles linked in this thread that debunk Giuliani and Trumps dishonest framing.
Heres a good one if you missed it (it is linked below)::
How Giuliani Is Conning The World Into Buying A False Biden-Ukraine Narrative
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/how-giuliani-is-conning-the-world-into-buying-a-false-biden-ukraine-narrative
Take care and have a good afternoon
FBaggins
(26,721 posts)Trump's framing is that both candidate Biden and his son were involved in corruption.
Thats not the full truth
Actually... I limited it to just what we knew was true - and I never went close to what Trump and Co are trying to make of it. I don't know whether the prosecutor was or was not corrupt... nor do I know whether current claims from people in Ukraine are accurate.
Once again... feel free to point out something I said that wasn't actually true.
emulatorloo
(44,071 posts)Theres no need for you and me to fight about this, were all in this together. we all need to push back on trumps lies.
Another good article, from the Intercept back in May. I dont think this one has been posted in this thread.
https://theintercept.com/2019/05/10/rumors-joe-biden-scandal-ukraine-absolute-nonsense-reformer-says/
A Republican Conspiracy Theory About a Biden-in-Ukraine Scandal Has Gone Mainstream. But It Is Not True.
Robert Mackey
May 10 2019, 4:52 p.m.
In an interview with The Intercept, Daria Kaleniuk, an American-educated lawyer who founded Ukraines Anti-Corruption Action Center, expressed frustration that two recent front-page stories in the New York Times, on how the conspiracy theory is being used to attack Biden, failed to properly debunk the false accusation. According to Kaleniuk, and a former anti-corruption prosecutor, there is simply no truth to the rumor now spreading like wildfire across the internet.
The accusation is that Biden blackmailed Ukraines new leaders into firing the countrys chief prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, to derail an investigation he was leading into a Ukrainian gas company that the vice presidents son, Hunter, was paid to advise.
The truth, Kaleniuk said, is that Shokin was forced from office at Bidens urging because he had failed to conduct thorough investigations of corruption, and had stifled efforts to investigate embezzlement and misconduct by public officials following the 2014 uprising.
Properly debunking this particular conspiracy theory is easier said than done, though, since it is set in Ukraine, a country with byzantine political intrigue at the best of times, and these are not the best of times. The rivalries between political factions in Kiev are so intense that even the countrys new anti-corruption agencies are at each others throats.
<more at link>
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)From May:
Kaskos assessment adds a wrinkle to one of the first political intrigues of the 2020 election season. It undercuts the idea that Biden, now a top Democratic presidential candidate, was seeking to sideline a prosecutor who was actively threatening a company tied to his son. Instead, it appears more consistent with Bidens previous statements that he was pressing for the removal of a prosecutor who was failing to tackle rampant corruption: According to public reports and internal documents from the Ukrainian prosecutors office, U.S. officials had expressed concern for more than a year about Ukrainian prosecutors failure to assist an international investigation of Zlochevsky.
...
Hunter Biden joined the board in April 2014, two months after U.K. authorities requested information from Ukraine as part of a probe against Zlochevsky related to money laundering allegations. Zlochevsky had been minister of environmental protection under then-President Viktor Yanukovych, who fled to Russia in February 2014 after mass protests.
...
The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others werent pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutors office reviewed by Bloomberg.
...
The U.S. stepped up its criticism in September 2015, when its ambassador to Ukraine, during a speech, accused officials working under Shokin of subverting the U.K. investigation.
...
The U.S. plan to push for Shokins dismissal didnt initially come from Biden, but rather filtered up from officials at the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, according to a person with direct knowledge of the situation. Embassy personnel had called for U.S. loan guarantees to Ukraine to be tied to broader anti-corruption efforts, including Shokins dismissal, this person said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-07/timeline-in-ukraine-probe-casts-doubt-on-giuliani-s-biden-claim
RelativelyJones
(898 posts)Karadeniz
(22,474 posts)intrepidity
(7,275 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Guess which is which.
Yup! You guessed right!
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)It was all of our Allies in the EU as well, if I recall.
UTUSN
(70,649 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,503 posts)Per the decisions and instructions of the DU Admins, all OP's regarding Democratic candidates for the Party's nomination for President are to be posted in the Democratic Primaries Forum. Please post your OP there. Thanks