Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,838 posts)
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:23 PM Sep 2019

Dad receives 4 months in prison for paying $250K to get son into USC

BOSTON – Devin Sloane, a Los Angles business executive, was sentenced Tuesday to four months in prison for paying $250,000 to get his son accepted into the University of Southern California as a fake water polo recruit.

He is the second parent to be sentenced in Boston federal court in the nation's college admissions scandal after actress Felicity Huffman received 14 days in prison this month.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani also sentenced Sloane to 500 hours of community service over two years and a $95,000 fine.

"Just because you’re a good person doesn’t mean you don’t commit a crime when you do those things," Talwani said. “I come back to the action you took in bribing a college official. Bribing a college official is a serious crime. You are not a repeat player, but what you did involved your child."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/dad-receives-4-months-in-prison-for-paying-dollar250k-to-get-son-into-usc/ar-AAHLUk0?li=BBnb7Kz

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dad receives 4 months in prison for paying $250K to get son into USC (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2019 OP
How about one month for every month it takes his son to graduate? brooklynite Sep 2019 #1
Brilliant! Mike 03 Sep 2019 #4
Too bad he didn't donate a building as he would never had been charged. LonePirate Sep 2019 #2
The big difference customerserviceguy Sep 2019 #8
It may be public but the result is the same - his children admitted for reasons except merit. LonePirate Sep 2019 #9
The whole college admissions thing customerserviceguy Sep 2019 #10
Not famous enough to get the celebrity discount? bullwinkle428 Sep 2019 #3
this is a far more serious offense than huffman. mopinko Sep 2019 #7
How much time did the person get who took the bribe? Mosby Sep 2019 #5
he's cooperating. mopinko Sep 2019 #6
What about the others? Blue_Tires Sep 2019 #11
yeah, they were bribing coaches. iirc at least one has pled guilty mopinko Sep 2019 #12
I guess my ultimate point is Blue_Tires Sep 2019 #13

LonePirate

(13,412 posts)
2. Too bad he didn't donate a building as he would never had been charged.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:30 PM
Sep 2019

He may have a seven or eight figure net worth but if he had a nine or more figure net worth, he could have donated a building or wing and his son would have been accepted without question. This is one of those situations where being rich but not insanely rich is not a whole lot different than being middle or lower class.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
8. The big difference
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:34 PM
Sep 2019

is that the rich person donating the building does so publicly, it is transparent. Frequently, the name of the rich person appears somewhere on the building. Also, other college students benefit from having the building, and for many years.

I'm waiting to see the sentences handed down to those who took the bribes.

LonePirate

(13,412 posts)
9. It may be public but the result is the same - his children admitted for reasons except merit.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 03:53 PM
Sep 2019

That is the core issue here. People going to extraordinary means to obtain an education for their kids - and education they would not receive otherwise.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
10. The whole college admissions thing
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 07:39 PM
Sep 2019

needs to be cleaned up. Certainly, taking away the ability of a coach in a non-revenue sport needs to be high on the list. I can see the possibility of doing away with it for child or grandchild of someone who endows a school with enough money to erect a building, but that's going to be tough. In that case, the loss of one admission to the general public is more than compensated by the benefit to many, many students over a long period of time.

And the whole monopolistic SAT, etc. organization needs a total revamp of procedures. If there were random assignment of proctors a week or two before an exam, the possibility of bribing a proctor gets eliminated. I've always felt that the Educational Testing Service has way too much power that can be abused.


mopinko

(70,067 posts)
7. this is a far more serious offense than huffman.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:50 PM
Sep 2019

this one had a fake sports resume, and bribed the coach.
huffman bribed a proctor.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
11. What about the others?
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 03:01 PM
Sep 2019

There's a whole chain involved here -- Someone in the athletic department would have had to sign off on this, and someone in admissions at the minimum...

mopinko

(70,067 posts)
12. yeah, they were bribing coaches. iirc at least one has pled guilty
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 03:04 PM
Sep 2019

and is cooperating.
those are the parents who are going to do time.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
13. I guess my ultimate point is
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 03:21 PM
Sep 2019

the schools should have more of the blame, imo... (But I realize that doesn't draw the same headlines like Hollywood celeb parents caught cheating the system)

At some point in the timeline, some person or persons at USC would have had to FIRST let that middleman/fixer/agent/bagman know that they were "open for business" and interested in joining his "network"... Otherwise the parents with cash in hand wouldn't have even known where to go...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dad receives 4 months in ...