General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSondland's bombshell testimony outlines 'the clear definition of bribery':
Ex-Defense Secretary PanettaThat is the clear definition of bribery, he said. And its a clear definition of what constitutes a violation of the presidents oath. So this is just additional evidence that when you look at the testimony, when you look at the facts here, it basically supports a charge against the president that he was deliberately misusing his office of the presidency.
[link:https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/sondlands-bombshell-testimony-outlines-the-clear-definition-of-bribery-ex-defense-secretary-panetta/|]
Heh... Trumps head is going to explode
elleng
(130,764 posts)Biden, transcript shows.
'The House committees overseeing the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump Tuesday released transcripts of testimony by Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, and Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine.
Both are key witnesses in the investigation and were questioned about requests for political investigations and the delay of military aid to Ukraine.
Sondland, a close ally of Trump, told lawmakers that it would be improper to ask a foreign government to investigate a political rival. When asked whether it would be illegal, Sondland replied: Im not a lawyer, but I assume so.
Sondland testified that Trumps personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, urged an investigation of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma for months this year. Sondland later learned that former Vice President Joe Bidens son Hunter worked at Burisma, but Sondland testified that he wasnt aware of that at the beginning. When asked again whether investigating the Bidens would be illegal, Sondland said it didnt look good.'>>>
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/05/impeachment-inquiry-volker-sondland-transcripts-released/4159097002/
stopdiggin
(11,248 posts)the stink is getting so bad that even the Rs (and the American voter) can't ignore it.
(Oh .. the spin merchants will always have a spin .. but stink is stink.)
BigmanPigman
(51,569 posts)instead of quid pro quo. Also, say "notes" from the transcript, not the actual transcript. This should be the Dems talking points. Get ahead of the GOP saying quid pro quo is OK, a nothingburder, etc.
Fla Dem
(23,591 posts)Enough with tiptoeing around it.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,555 posts)In this case, To withhold military aid.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,262 posts)It becomes, "Do me a favor or become Putin's satellite."