Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(102,119 posts)
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 03:26 PM Nov 2019

U.S. judge fast-tracks hearing over House impeachment subpoena to ex-Trump deputy national security






A federal judge on Monday fast-tracked a former national security aide’s request for the courts to decide whether he must comply with a White House order not to testify or Congress’s subpoena in the House impeachment inquiry.

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon of Washington ordered final arguments to be held Dec. 10 at the request of Charles Kupperman, a former deputy national security adviser in the Trump administration.

Leon had previously said he intended not to take up the merits of the lawsuit until a later date. His shift comes as more White House officials have defied subpoenas but sets up a potentially landmark legal battle over the White House’s ability to defy Congress’s impeachment powers.

Kupperman, who served as deputy to former national security adviser John Bolton, filed a lawsuit asking for a court to resolve the competing demands.


more at the link
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. judge fast-tracks hearing over House impeachment subpoena to ex-Trump deputy national security (Original Post) hlthe2b Nov 2019 OP
The courts should have set up an ad hoc panel to move these obstructive suits along. Karadeniz Nov 2019 #1
That's not how the courts work StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #2
so hand it over to the JAG and let the Army round 'em all up! Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #3
It also would mean that other litigants whose cases are very important to them StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #4
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
2. That's not how the courts work
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 04:28 PM
Nov 2019

Courts manage cases within their jurisdictions and it's up to the judges to determine how to manage their cases.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,249 posts)
3. so hand it over to the JAG and let the Army round 'em all up!
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 06:12 PM
Nov 2019

Or they could pull Judge Dredd out of mothballs and see if these scofflaws wanna face some rockets.

Seriously, I wish "fast tracking" meant 2 weeks, not a month. It might cause some paralegals to need medical attention, though, trying to round up all the info in that amount of time.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
4. It also would mean that other litigants whose cases are very important to them
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 06:57 PM
Nov 2019

would be forced to delay - including criminal defendants and prisoners whose lives and liberty are at stake and who also want to have their cases decided as quickly as possible and not pushed down on the docket because other, high profile cases have been given a priority over them.

It's a careful balance best left up to the judges and panels managing the dockets.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. judge fast-tracks he...