Let me begin by stating that it is not my intent to instruct the "whistle-blower" as to how he or

[Atticus]

she should proceed. That decision involves their personal safety and the decision is exclusively theirs to make---at least temporarily.

Since it seems highly likely that, between Donny Jr., Rand Paul and several dozen other like-minded nitwits, the whistle-blower's identity WILL be publicized, my question is might it actually be better for that person to take the initiative, call a press conference and voluntarily tell the world who they are and why they felt compelled to blow their whistle?

As I said, not meant to say what should be their course. Just a thought.