Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLoyalty vs. Democracy
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/11/trump-impeachment-transcripts-facts-democracy-sondland-graham.htmlLoyalty vs. Democracy
The impeachment transcripts say Republicans have to choose between Trump and Americas political future.
By Fred Kaplan
Nov 06, 2019
5:46 PM
snip//
Republicans risk turning gaslighting into a permanent political condition.
Trumps lines of defense have been crumbling under each wave of new facts. First, his phone call with Zelensky was said to be perfect. (Trump continues to make this claim, though he is nearly alone in doing so.) Then, yes, Trump pressured Zelensky, but there was no quid pro quo. Then, OK, there was a quid pro quo, but diplomacy is all about quid pro quos. Then, well, all right, this quid pro quo involved pressuring a foreign power to defame a possible rival in an American presidential election, and that doesnt look good, but its not an impeachable offense. Finally, at our present moment, some Republicans realize that it is impeachable as an abuse of power and possibly as an act of bribery. So they decide, like Graham, to ignore the evidence. The main way theyve done this is to condemn the process of the impeachment inquiry as corrupt and, therefore, the evidence it has gathered as illegitimatein the same sense that evidence improperly seized by police would be thrown out in a trial.
But as the transcripts of the hearings have been made public, this final line of defense has crumbled too. First, the hearings were not partisan, much less Soviet-style show trials, as Rep. Steve Scalise, the House minority whip, put it while displaying a picture of St. Basils Cathedral (the least Soviet-style structure in Moscows Red Square). The transcripts list all the House members who attended, and, it turns out, they included several Republicans. (As had long been stated, all members of the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Judiciary committees were authorized to attend the hearings.)
Republicans, as well as Democrats, were also permitted to ask testifiers questions. The Republicans main problem was that the witnesses didnt leave them much room to score points. During the deposition of Marie Yovanovitch, the former ambassador to Ukraine, some Republicans probed for signs that she was biased against Trump. At one point, South Carolina Republican Mark Meadowswho was plowing that field most strenuouslyasked how she came by the nickname Masha.* Yovanovitch replied that shes half Russian, and its a Russian nickname. Meadows abruptly ended his questioning, though he had some time left to ask more.
Trying to discredit critical witnesses, cherry-picking evidence, changing an argument to its opposite in order to defend the leaderto some extent, this is politics as usual, indulged in by both parties. But something different is going on here, and if it persists without penalty, it may haveeven compared with the many degradations that the Trump era has inflicted on American politicsthe most degrading impact of them all.
Not only are Trump and his defenders sidestepping the most basic facts, not only are they undermining the primacy of facts as the foundation of debate and democracy, they are turning gaslightinga form of psychological manipulation to make people question their own perceptions, memories, views of right and wrong and reality, so as to make them more and more dependent on the manipulatorinto a permanent political condition. If this continues, everything in politicsdomestic and internationaldwindles into pretense and theatrics. The people and their leaders become mutual enablers in an ever-deepening cynicism. Its not that nobody can trust anything any politician says again; its that mistrust becomes assumed as a given.
It is stupefyingor maybe it is completely predictablethat a self-obsessed showman like Donald Trump has led us into this rot. The question is whether any prominent Republicans will snap their comrades out of the spell.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 397 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Loyalty vs. Democracy (Original Post)
babylonsister
Nov 2019
OP
Wounded Bear
(58,642 posts)1. The politics of personal loyalty is feudalism, not democracy...
used by totalitarian states and crime families.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,321 posts)2. the entire party relies on blind obedience and loyalty
It's a dangerous cult.