Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Moderately Indefensible Career of Rep. Peter King
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/11/peter-king-congress-retirement.htmlThe Moderately Indefensible Career of Rep. Peter King
By Jim Newell
Nov 11, 20193:23 PM
snip//
It is correct to note that Kings voting record is moderate relative to those of his colleagues. He supports gun control measures, including a ban on assault weapons, and was a vocal opponent of Republicans 2017 tax cut bill, which was built to bring tax hikes to districts like his own. He was often at odds with the ideological crusaders who dominated House Republican majorities over the decades. He said in the 1990s that then-Speaker Newt Gingrich was turning the GOP into hillbillies at revival meetings, and he voted against President Bill Clintons impeachment. He held a special contempt for Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, going back to the Cruz-led 2013 government shutdown. I hate Ted Cruz, and I think Ill take cyanide if he ever got the nomination, King said during the 2016 presidential primaries. The King that Schumer remembers fondly is the one who shared Schumers belief that small-government Republican hard-liners made it difficult for government to accomplish its central purpose, securing federal money for New York commuter transit projects.
Admiration for these aspects of Kings relative moderation within the GOP conference, however, is inversely correlated with ones likelihood to be subject to civil liberties violations. While King may not have shared some of his partys fanatical opposition to things like refundable tax credits, he went above and beyond many of them in his harassment of minority communities.
When King took back the gavel to the Homeland Security Committee in 2011, one of his first priorities was to hold hearings on radicalization within American Muslim communities. Trust in Kings ability to hold such a hearing with anything resembling neutrality was limited, given that this was the same congressman who had claimed in 2007 that there were too many mosques in this country, too many people that are sympathetic to radical Islam and had also said that 85 percent of American mosques were controlled by extremist leadership. After Trumps election, King recommended to the president-elect that he establish a federal Muslim surveillance program similar to the shameful, disbanded one run by the New York Police Department following 9/11. (King was unyieldingly defensive of any and every thing that any police officer had ever done, and he once compared NFL players kneeling in protest of police abuse to giving Nazi salutes.)
Kings maximalist approach to terrorism done by Muslims showed none of the nuance he applied in the 1980s to the Troubles. Before he was Longtime GOP Rep. Peter King, he was Long Island Irish Guy Peter King. In that capacity he was a vocal defender of the Irish Republican Army, serving up such spicy moral-relativist takes as: If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the I.R.A. for it. This history resurfaced in 2011 as King was prepping his Muslim radicalization hearings, and King defended himself by noting that the IRAs acts of terrorism were over there.
I understand why people who are misinformed might see a parallel, he said. The fact is, the I.R.A. never attacked the United States. And my loyalty is to the United States.
This side of Kings record is why many Americans, even those who share his loathing of Ted Cruz and lax firearms regulations, will be pleased to see this figure who stood head & shoulders above everyone else return to the south shore of Long Island without a congressional voting card. To the Baileys of Massapequa, the fictional family to whom Chuck Schumer dedicates his politics, he might have been a common-sense solutions guy. It was what the Baileys were willing to overlook that made him such a fright to others.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 489 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Moderately Indefensible Career of Rep. Peter King (Original Post)
babylonsister
Nov 2019
OP
Gothmog
(144,919 posts)1. I am so very glad to see this asshole retire
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)2. He most likely saw the writing on the wall.
His district has long been a White enclave, but like all such places close to a major city, it is becoming less White and better educated, both conditions are deadly poisons to a republican officeholder.