General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI Don't Know WHO to Believe In This Impeachment Hearing
https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-dont-know-who-to-believe-in-this-impeachment-hearing?fbclid=IwAR3bCaRYrlYDHZx8wMqeu3lZVqETluEf4E7pkUr1Pjw8awsj78bVnLM-xGINovember 13, 2019
I Dont Know WHO to Believe In This Impeachment Hearing
by Devorah Blachor
snip//
At the hearing, I saw two serious, professional men who both served under Republican and Democrat administrations. Yet just last week, President Trump was ordered to pay two million dollars for using charity funds to pay off his business debts and promote himself. How can a voter like me be expected to know who is more credible?
These men testified under oath that the president tried to withhold military aid to a crucial ally unless the Ukranian president made a phony and defamatory speech about Joe Biden, and I admit that does sound slightly damning. At the same time, theres a white supremacist working closely with Donald Trump who orchestrated the immigration policy which separated thousands of children, including babies, from their parents. Politics are so complicated!
What sounds more believable? That career diplomats with everything to lose would make up a story implicating the most powerful man in America? Or that the presidents butt-dialling, criminal-loving lawyer was involved in something nefarious? I wish this would be easier!
Im no political scientist, but it seems to me that a man who has told 13,435 lies and has equated Nazis with people protesting Nazis, and who publicly stated hed date his own daughter, and who tried and failed to buy Greenland is at least as honest as the many people, both Republican and Democrat, who have testified against him in this impeachment hearing.
You know, everyone keeps repeating this story about Ben Franklin over and over again you know the one about how in 1787, as the Constitution was adopted, Americans gathered on the steps of Independence Hall. When they saw Franklin, they asked, What do we have, a republic or a monarchy? and Franklin replied, A republic, if you can keep it.
But what did Ben Franklin even mean by that? Was he trying to say that a Democracy is only as strong as its institutions and that if the people in power become nakedly corrupt and are not checked, that Democracy becomes a hollow pretense thats no better than a despotic monarchy? Or did he mean that the newly founded nation was a banana republic?
Someone help me! Im utterly baffled! How will we ever get to the bottom of these impeachment hearings? I fear that America will be lost amidst the fog of uncertainty, destined to wander in the wilderness of chaos for a very long time indeed. A very, very long time.
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)It's a head scratcher.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)a world-wide, all powerful socialist/commie/liberal conspiracy to take down the greatest man to ever live...better than Jesus even!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,588 posts)Nice to see a literate person with a sense of humor.
Karadeniz
(22,506 posts)warmfeet
(3,321 posts)it's a tough call for sure.
Who to believe? Hmm?
The liars, or the truth tellers.
One may never know.
bitterross
(4,066 posts)Like all the Republicans and Trump supporters, she uses "Democrat" rather than Democratic. It's a tell that lets us know exactly where her sympathies lie.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)But that's the precisely the term that I would expect from a flibberdigibbet low-to-no-information voter. She nailed that part.
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)bitterross
(4,066 posts)It's so difficult to detect satire these days. Given that reality is so close to that all the time now.
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Hermit-The-Prog This message was self-deleted by its author.