Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's No Accident That Democrats Keep Accusing Trump Of 'Bribery'
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/democrats-bribery-impeachment-pelosi-schiff?fbclid=IwAR0P3CwchoMqIO-Ux6Y069FXNKSn0NBhOq5GPUWD77SP4mz1RS_OFUebLhIIts No Accident That Democrats Keep Accusing Trump Of Bribery
By Kate Riga
November 14, 2019 12:07 p.m.
Bribery is the new quid pro quo, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) made clear during her weekly press conference Thursday.
The bribe is to grant or withhold military assistance in return for a public statement of a fake investigation into the elections. Thats bribery, she said, noting that the term is in the Constitution attached to impeachment proceedings.
Link to tweet
Pelosi is carrying out a new tactic also seen in the phrasing of House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) and committee member Jackie Spier (D-CA) this week.
Their word choice is no coincidence.
Article II of the Constitution reads: The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Democrats appear to be recalibrating their messaging to tie President Donald Trumps actions directly to impeachment. And the switch-up likely has other benefits as well.
snip//
The vocabulary change may also help Democrats puncture a Republican talking point. Republicans have, by and large, been successful at getting their preferred names for recent political situations to stick think no collusion during the Mueller investigation, or read the transcript for the edited White House memo of the Trump-Zelensky call. Now, its no quid pro quo.
Their messaging, while lacking any nuance and usually at least stretching the truth, sticks. Now Democrats will see if bribery strikes the American people as more egregious than quid pro quo despite the fact that both terms are catchalls for the same behavior.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1059 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's No Accident That Democrats Keep Accusing Trump Of 'Bribery' (Original Post)
babylonsister
Nov 2019
OP
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)1. qui munera libenter accipiunt
if you can say it.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)2. Waiting for them to argue
It was extortion and not bribery. Of course extortion is not nearly as serious as lying about having consensual sex.
BuffaloJackalope
(818 posts)3. They're using the word "bribery" because that's what it is.
"Quid pro quo" is the obfuscation stretching the truth.
tirebiter
(2,536 posts)4. Purely and simply bribery
Just like it says in the constitution...treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors...NAILED. Now lock him up.