Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Snopes---OH law that students can't be penalized 4 answers that agree with their religion is NO prob (Original Post) bobbieinok Nov 2019 OP
Link, please? The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #1
I found it here exboyfil Nov 2019 #3
LOL my Old Testament professor told us the first day of class yellowdogintexas Nov 2019 #4
Here's the Snopes link Qutzupalotl Nov 2019 #5
How will a teacher know that the student's answers are correct... NeoGreen Nov 2019 #2
So then... Newest Reality Nov 2019 #6
Can't wait until someone does, pointing out crickets Nov 2019 #7
Yes, and Ramen! Newest Reality Nov 2019 #9
I'll go with snopes on this one. Ms. Toad Nov 2019 #8

yellowdogintexas

(22,250 posts)
4. LOL my Old Testament professor told us the first day of class
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 02:28 PM
Nov 2019

that some of us would be shocked, frightened, or vehemently disagree with the things were going to study, starting with the "Mythology of the Ancient Hebrews" He defined mythology as the attempt of uncivilized man to explain things they did not understand

He also emphatically stated that he welcomed lively discussion in class, in the Snack Bar, in his office or walking around campus but to not even dare to try it on an exam because he would take off lots of points.

I loved him. He would rant magnificently about literalists, inerrant truth, absurdity of the Bible directly written by God, and many other fundamentalist beliefs. He had a string of invectives: balderdash, claptrap, hogwash, poppycock and gutter rubbish. All in a row, but always in different orders and at the top of his lungs. That skinny little man could raise a ruckus too

Ordained United Methodist minister, Divinity degree and PhD from Vanderbilt.

One could not be classified as a Junior unless this course and the companion New Testament course had been passed.

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)
2. How will a teacher know that the student's answers are correct...
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 02:26 PM
Nov 2019

...in regards to the dogma of the selected religion.

Are we now Ok with having the government evaluate students for Heresy?

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
6. So then...
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 02:29 PM
Nov 2019

A Pastafarian can cite the correlation of the number of pirates to climate change as the cause without being penalized, or not?

crickets

(25,960 posts)
7. Can't wait until someone does, pointing out
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 03:27 PM
Nov 2019

how silly it is to give religious answers to questions on a science test. No disrespect to His Noodly Appendage intended.

Ms. Toad

(34,059 posts)
8. I'll go with snopes on this one.
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 03:35 PM
Nov 2019
Sec. 3320.03. No school district board of education, governing authority of a community school established under Chapter 3314. of the Revised Code, governing body of a STEM school established under Chapter 3326. of the Revised Code, or board of trustees of a college-preparatory boarding school established under Chapter 3328. of the Revised Code shall prohibit a student from engaging in religious expression in the completion of homework, artwork, or other written or oral assignments. Assignment grades and scores shall be calculated using ordinary academic standards of substance and relevance, including any legitimate pedagogical concerns, and shall not penalize or reward a student based on the religious content of a student’s work.


Ordinar academic standards of substance and relevance = only science-based answers are relevant in science- based classes. However - if an art assignment is to depict the creation of the world, a student could not be penalized for depicting God creating the world - or for depicting it as a consequence of a big celestial bang.

I think the concern is hyperbole by people who read reports of the law, rather than the law itself. Which is essentially what snopes says.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Snopes---OH law that stud...