General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSnopes---OH law that students can't be penalized 4 answers that agree with their religion is NO prob
PZ Meyer discusses today at his blog pharyngula why Snopes gets it wrong!!
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)exboyfil
(17,862 posts)yellowdogintexas
(22,250 posts)that some of us would be shocked, frightened, or vehemently disagree with the things were going to study, starting with the "Mythology of the Ancient Hebrews" He defined mythology as the attempt of uncivilized man to explain things they did not understand
He also emphatically stated that he welcomed lively discussion in class, in the Snack Bar, in his office or walking around campus but to not even dare to try it on an exam because he would take off lots of points.
I loved him. He would rant magnificently about literalists, inerrant truth, absurdity of the Bible directly written by God, and many other fundamentalist beliefs. He had a string of invectives: balderdash, claptrap, hogwash, poppycock and gutter rubbish. All in a row, but always in different orders and at the top of his lungs. That skinny little man could raise a ruckus too
Ordained United Methodist minister, Divinity degree and PhD from Vanderbilt.
One could not be classified as a Junior unless this course and the companion New Testament course had been passed.
Qutzupalotl
(14,300 posts)NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)...in regards to the dogma of the selected religion.
Are we now Ok with having the government evaluate students for Heresy?
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)A Pastafarian can cite the correlation of the number of pirates to climate change as the cause without being penalized, or not?
crickets
(25,960 posts)how silly it is to give religious answers to questions on a science test. No disrespect to His Noodly Appendage intended.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,059 posts)Ordinar academic standards of substance and relevance = only science-based answers are relevant in science- based classes. However - if an art assignment is to depict the creation of the world, a student could not be penalized for depicting God creating the world - or for depicting it as a consequence of a big celestial bang.
I think the concern is hyperbole by people who read reports of the law, rather than the law itself. Which is essentially what snopes says.