Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SKKY

(11,803 posts) Tue Nov 19, 2019, 12:59 PM Nov 2019

This is what the GOP defense has been reduced to...

...How many times was the word "bribery" used in the depositions. I understand their ire. If I had this shit hand to play, I'd probably be pretty upset as well.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is what the GOP defense has been reduced to... (Original Post) SKKY Nov 2019 OP

If I had this shit hand to play, I'd be joining the other team. Pacifist Patriot Nov 2019 #1

I see what you did there. SKKY Nov 2019 #4

They have nothing Botany Nov 2019 #2

+1 progressoid Nov 2019 #3

I sort of disagree Dirty Socialist Nov 2019 #5

Pacifist Patriot

(24,653 posts)

1. If I had this shit hand to play, I'd be joining the other team.

Reply to SKKY (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 01:02 PM

Nov 2019

That was a horrible mixed metaphor, wasn't it?

SKKY

(11,803 posts)

4. I see what you did there.

Reply to Pacifist Patriot (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 01:11 PM

Nov 2019

Botany

(70,489 posts)

2. They have nothing

Reply to SKKY (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 01:03 PM

Nov 2019

“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”

― Carl Sandburg

progressoid

(49,978 posts)

3. +1

Reply to Botany (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 01:05 PM

Nov 2019

Dirty Socialist

(3,252 posts)

5. I sort of disagree

Reply to SKKY (Original post)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 01:16 PM

Nov 2019

While they are starting to use that feeble defense, they are also using the defense that Trump was trying to fight corruption, to which I disagree.

Reply to this discussion