General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEric Swalwell debunks Elise Stefanik's entire defense of Trump in just 15 seconds
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/eric-swalwell-debunks-elise-stefaniks-entire-defense-of-trump-in-just-15-seconds/?fbclid=IwAR1woEtz3iwc7Do68FMA1emK8whcamotMtdCEADweSoNt6kAwB4tt70bC2AEric Swalwell debunks Elise Stefaniks entire defense of Trump in just 15 seconds
Published 47 mins ago
on November 19, 2019
By Brad Reed
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) on Tuesday quickly took apart Rep. Elise Stefaniks (R-NY) defense of President Donald Trump during public impeachment hearings.
While questioning Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, Stefanik made a point of emphasizing delivering military aid to Ukraine requires ensuring that the country is working to root out corruption.
That is correct, he replied.
So for the public listening, we are not just talking about President Trump focusing on anti-corruption in Ukraine, she said. But it is so critical, so important that when hard-earned taxpayer dollars are given to foreign nations that, by law, overwhelmingly bipartisan support requires anti-corruption in Ukraine in order to get U.S. taxpayer-funded aid.
After Stefanik finished her questioning, Swalwell began by asking Vindman a simple question that directly undermined Stefaniks argument.
That is correct, he replied.
Watch the video below.
malaise
(268,892 posts)big time
lunatica
(53,410 posts)malaise
(268,892 posts)Meanwhile Elise Stefanik's Democratic opponent, Tedra Cobb, is raking in the money.
Keep on making an ass of yourself Elise.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)So everyone should just back off and pay attention. Give her all the rope she wants, and hand her a shovel too. Then get out of her way!
mgardener
(1,815 posts)Elise.
Moral coward.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)proud patriot
(100,705 posts)NBachers
(17,098 posts)wiggs
(7,811 posts)what Trump did? Trump took public money and used it for his own, unauthorized, personal reasons. Isn't that embezzlement? And Trump sought something of value from foreign countries! Isn't that emoluments?
And why doesn't anyone bring up the likelihood that Trump and co-conspirators have used the power of the WH many other times with other countries, organizations, and individuals??? We know enough about Russia, SA, Turkey, probably Qatar, maybe others to be openly suspicious that Ukraine is not an isolated incident.
I liked Schiff's demeanor at the end...anger and disgust. That dems and media are using the words bribery and extortion and corruption is important, and hints at the SERIOUS nature of the misconduct. Let's consider embezzlement, emoluments along with those. They don't have to be part of the articles, if not technically appropriate...however that shouldn't stop dem leaders, journalists, and pundits from asking if they shouldn't be used and incorporating them daily into the discussion.
Mr.Bill
(24,274 posts)that would be a separate investigation with different witnesses. I do think they should do this.
In my perfect world, when the impeachable offenses are read in the Senate it would take several days to read them all.
wiggs
(7,811 posts)all make it into the articles, the context of daily, outrageous, impeachable misconduct is important to establish for everyone. Pretty sure 90% of DU knows most of them but the public does not.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)JudyM
(29,225 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,405 posts)was the "shit" - to use a current term - after Swalwell's question that script turned to actual shit.