a thought about subpoenas and scotus. correct me if i'm wrong.

[mopinko]

first i will say that i predict scotus will duck quite a few of these shit bombs. what they take and what they duck should be interesting.
that said, i think they will take a couple of them, just to explain the constitution to the idiot king.
i think subpoenas will be one.

now, correct me here, but once they swat the first bit on nonsense falls, they all fall.

kaboom. just in time for the senate trial.
maybe sooner.

does anybody have specifics on what is headed up and how close it is?

[Thomas Hurt]

1. Last I heard Roberts issued an indefinite stay

not sure what that means.....can they just sit on it until after the election?

[mopinko]

2. i imagine they could if they wanted to light the rep of the court on fire for all time, but

i dont think they are gonna let spanky push them all that hard.
i dont think roberts wants to be his dog, and i think they have pushed some incredibly stupid legal theories that should quite rightly be laughed out of court.

but w so many, i really think they have to speak.

[Vinca]

3. I think the SCOTUS decision will be whether we have an elected president or a king.

No one is above the law and in this particular case the statute says the taxes SHALL be provided with no weasel clauses.

[mopinko]

4. that's an easy one for them to duck.

sorry loser, you already lost, we let your loss stand.

[Blue_true]

5. If the Supreme Court backs him, our President should take advantage of every door

that the Court opens.