Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,081 posts) Fri Nov 22, 2019, 09:05 PM Nov 2019

stats on this ad? anybody?

I recall a program that helped homeowners under water on their mortgages under Obama administration.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

stats on this ad? anybody? (Original Post) SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2019 OP

In the lower right corner is the answer. Croney Nov 2019 #1

thank you. found this... SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2019 #2

Perfect example why we need truth in advertising backtoblue Nov 2019 #3

Croney

(4,656 posts)

1. In the lower right corner is the answer.

Reply to SleeplessinSoCal (Original post)

Fri Nov 22, 2019, 09:12 PM

Nov 2019

LowerMyBills is just a loan company. They plug in whatever name they think might attract business.

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,081 posts)

2. thank you. found this...

Reply to Croney (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 02:32 PM

Nov 2019

According to Wikipedia

Deadline

Although the HARP program was originally scheduled to end on December 31, 2016, the Federal Housing Agency announced in August 2016 that it would be extended though September 2017. The program was extended again on August 17, 2017 through December 2018.

backtoblue

(11,343 posts)

3. Perfect example why we need truth in advertising

Reply to SleeplessinSoCal (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 03:14 PM

Nov 2019

If you want to go down an interesting rabbit hole, go to google and search their ad partners. (Nielson in particular). Click on the links like you are an advertiser.

Behavioral economics meets psychographic advertising...

Kinda off topic, but messing around with human emotions to sell us shit, (much less affect our vote) is not a good thing.

Reply to this discussion