Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:09 AM

Why are people talking like the impeachment inquiry is finished?

Has the House said it's finished?

19 replies, 1790 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

19 replies	Author	Time	Post
Why are people talking like the impeachment inquiry is finished? (Original post)	Progressive Jones	Nov 2019	OP
No, they just reached the end of scheduled testimony.	Qutzupalotl	Nov 2019	#1
Good to hear.	Progressive Jones	Nov 2019	#5
Because the media is bored and ready to move on to the next thing	StarfishSaver	Nov 2019	#2
You must not have been watching MSNBC or reading the NYT or WaPo this evening.	The Velveteen Ocelot	Nov 2019	#7
No. Speaker Pelosi	underthematrix	Nov 2019	#3
do you have link to that story?	dweller	Nov 2019	#10
News just came out that our Intel has briefed Senate about Russian disinfo campaign	wishstar	Nov 2019	#14
On the contrary.	The Velveteen Ocelot	Nov 2019	#4
The impeachment inquiry is anything but finished; we simply ended the first act, Baby!	Brother Buzz	Nov 2019	#6
It is not finished	ritapria	Nov 2019	#8
AFAIK	pat_k	Nov 2019	#9
But they sent first round to judiciary to impeachment charges	California_Republic	Nov 2019	#11
Message auto-removed	Name removed	Nov 2019	#12
It now goes to the Judicial committee to write up articles of impeachment.	Kablooie	Nov 2019	#13
Just the end of the very beginning	C_U_L8R	Nov 2019	#15
Nope. Especially not after last night.	tavernier	Nov 2019	#16
A lot of people let the media lead them by the nose. nt	RandiFan1290	Nov 2019	#17
FOX watchers are the worst at that. NT	Progressive Jones	Nov 2019	#19
nope	spanone	Nov 2019	#18

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:12 AM

Qutzupalotl (13,177 posts)

1. No, they just reached the end of scheduled testimony.

Schiff explicitly said he’s not ruling out the possibility of more witnesses.

We are waiting on a court decision regarding McGahan on Monday. If the ruling is in our favor, I expect the floodgates to open.

Reply to this post

Response to Qutzupalotl (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:15 AM

Progressive Jones (6,011 posts)

5. Good to hear.

I'm seeing reports of Lev Parnas turning over some evidence.
This would be more ammo for Schiff.

Reply to this post

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:14 AM

StarfishSaver (18,486 posts)

2. Because the media is bored and ready to move on to the next thing

Reply to this post

Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:16 AM

The Velveteen Ocelot (105,684 posts)

7. You must not have been watching MSNBC or reading the NYT or WaPo this evening.

They were very, very excited about the new State Department documents. Ali Velshi was just about jumping out of his skin.

Reply to this post

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:14 AM

underthematrix (5,792 posts)

3. No. Speaker Pelosi

now has to respond to the NYT story that suggest TRUMP may be a Russian agent because he got the fact free Ukranian conspiracy DIRECTLY from Putin. GOP House and senate also implicated.

Reply to this post

Response to underthematrix (Reply #3)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:28 AM

dweller (21,937 posts)

10. do you have link to that story?

i haven't seen it

tia

✌🏼

Reply to this post

Response to dweller (Reply #10)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 03:41 AM

wishstar (4,991 posts)

14. News just came out that our Intel has briefed Senate about Russian disinfo campaign

this is the link https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/22/us/politics/ukraine-russia-interference.html

Obviously Trump and Graham and Repub leaders in Congress are carrying water for the Russians spreading the Russian propaganda that has tried to change narrative to framing Ukraine for 2016 election interference

Reply to this post

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:14 AM

The Velveteen Ocelot (105,684 posts)

4. On the contrary.

They are starting to draft their report but they are open to interviewing other witnesses, and now that the State Department documents have been turned over they will certainly follow up on Rudy's connections to Pompeo via Trump's personal secretary. Several House members who were interviewed said they aren't done yet.

Reply to this post

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:15 AM

Brother Buzz (32,742 posts)

6. The impeachment inquiry is anything but finished; we simply ended the first act, Baby!

Reply to this post

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:20 AM

ritapria (1,812 posts)

8. It is not finished

The Dems are waiting for a judicial ruling ordering former WH Counsel Don McGahn to testify before Congress ..That ruling is expected Monday ...If the judges orders McGahn to do so , he will have to spill the beans on the numerous occasions Trump attempted to obstruct justice during the Mueller probe ….That hearing , presumably conducted by the House Judiciary Comm. , will be televised nationally as well ………

Reply to this post

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:21 AM

pat_k (9,292 posts)

9. AFAIK

The inquiry isn't "finished" until they determine and present articles of impeachment for a vote -- or declare that the inquiry did not find conduct deemed impeachable.

Reply to this post

Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 01:46 AM

California_Republic (1,826 posts)