General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLook what this fucker has done now: Trump 2016 campaign shakedown of facebook
Last edited Sat Nov 23, 2019, 04:52 PM - Edit history (1)
They got it.
Link to tweet
cilla4progress
(24,717 posts)nauseum!
TheBlackAdder
(28,167 posts)trueblue2007
(17,193 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,167 posts)2naSalit
(86,323 posts)natural resources like ownership of a national forest or park.
mopinko
(69,990 posts)the way these idiots try the same play over and over, laying it out plainly once, and a lot of things start making sense to the jury.
RainCaster
(10,831 posts)we can do it
(12,169 posts)drmeow
(5,012 posts)AllaN01Bear
(17,987 posts)Doodley
(9,036 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)and they fold. I give up!
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)That's what Trump does to businesses.
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)We need to chase down info on this FB employee James Barnes.
Is he living above his income from his FB job?
What's going on here?
Does he also get to play at Adult Playground Camp David?
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,065 posts)here? He's offered campaign funds to others to help in running for their elected offices again.
Is this a massive fraud on ripping the money off his campaign to pay off his business creditors? Sounds more and more like it.
spanone
(135,791 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)The actual headline at the WSJ is:
James Barnes is now focused on using digital-ad strategies to try to get Trump out of office
I'm sorry, but your subject line is very misleading.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)I'll try to find a way to change it.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)What I was seeing in many posts in this thread was the assumption being made that the subject is the 2020 campaign - largely due, I think, to people not actually clicking on the WSJ link embedded in the tweet.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)You know, the one that NEVER gets paid.
Why not just call it free and get it over with? This is silly. Facebook, you are giving are giving the campaign a donation that you can claim as a loss. Get with it.
Zoonart
(11,832 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)What was that about?
Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)Blue Owl
(50,257 posts)Fuckkk the both of their lousy, miserable asses.
Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)Zambero
(8,962 posts)He's now the proud dispenser of a line of very BAD credit.
underpants
(182,603 posts)Facebook is for old people (like me) who tune in to see how people they'd forgotten about are doing....oh, old people. I've got it.
bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)Companies go the way of dinosaurs quickly. It's already begun.
rockfordfile
(8,695 posts)Facebook is un-American company.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,164 posts)Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)like a mafia organization. However these moves seem legal if not unethical or normal. my worry is how domestic and international corporations will reacte in the future regarding the presidency and their willingness to be extorted for favors.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)I can't read the article, so don't quite get why Trump would need a line of credit.