Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
Tue Nov 26, 2019, 10:56 AM Nov 2019

McGahn's 30hrs of Mueller testimony cannot be quashed via Executive Privilege



Glenn Kirschner

@glennkirschner2
Lots of folks asking this. Two points I think are worth making: 1. McGahn CAN NOT legitimately invoke executive privilege on any topics that were the subject of his 30 hours of interviews with team Mueller. Why? Executive privilege (EP) has been waived three times over.




5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McGahn's 30hrs of Mueller testimony cannot be quashed via Executive Privilege (Original Post) Roland99 Nov 2019 OP
This is bigger than simply not "quashing" his 30 hours of testimony StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #1
My point, though NewJeffCT Nov 2019 #3
That's no longer the only option - or even the main one at this point, though StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #4
Glenn is replying to me there NewJeffCT Nov 2019 #2
+1 Roland99 Nov 2019 #5
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
1. This is bigger than simply not "quashing" his 30 hours of testimony
Tue Nov 26, 2019, 11:00 AM
Nov 2019

Kirschner is correctly pointing out that, in allowing McGahn to testify to Mueller, he effectively waived any claims of executive privilege over anything that McGahn discussed in those interviews.

You can't let someone reveal information that was privileged and then try to re-invoke the privilege. Once it's waived, it's waived.

That means not just that McGahn's previous testimony can be shared. More important it means that he has to testify about any topic that came up in the Mueller interviews and Trump can't prevent him from doing so by invoking executive privilege - because he already let that cow out of the barn.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
3. My point, though
Tue Nov 26, 2019, 11:06 AM
Nov 2019

was that McGahn may still try to invoke Executive Privilege when giving a deposition to the House and/or testifying before the committee. Yes, it may be bogus and legally invalid, but the House's main option would be to then make a criminal referral to DOJ and we know what will happen when it gets to Barr's desk...

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
4. That's no longer the only option - or even the main one at this point, though
Tue Nov 26, 2019, 11:10 AM
Nov 2019

Now that the court's involved and has issued a direct order to McGahn, if he defies it, he's in contempt of Court, not just contempt of Congress. That's a whole different ball of wax. The Court has enforcement tools Congress doesn't have.

The Court can order him fined or jailed. He'd also be in danger of losing his law license.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
2. Glenn is replying to me there
Tue Nov 26, 2019, 11:02 AM
Nov 2019

I'm Jeff Blue Wave 2020 @NewJeffCT (same name as here on DU since 2003)

Glenn's pretty cool like that in responding to the occasional person that comments on his tweets.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
5. +1
Tue Nov 26, 2019, 11:19 AM
Nov 2019

Cool. I’ve had Twitter convos with Andrew Laurel...he’s rather engaging

And you have a new follower now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McGahn's 30hrs of Mueller...