Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(70,683 posts)
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 01:25 PM Nov 2019

Carbon footprint of EMAILS "ruining the environment" - but, *whew*!1, "isn't huge"!1

So first they found another disastrous thing to worry us with, then say it ain't THAT bad. I can keep sending my email alerts about wingnuts!1

**********QUOTE*******

https://nypost.com/2019/11/26/your-emails-are-ruining-the-environment-study/

Your emails are ruining the environment: study

.... The study, commissioned by OVO Energy, England’s leading energy supply company, used the UK as a case study and found that one less “thank you” email a day would cut 16,433 tons of carbon caused by the high-energy servers used to send the online messages.

That’s the equivalent of 81,152 flights to Madrid or taking 3,334 diesel cars off the road, the research said. ....

The top 10 most “unnecessary” emails include: “Thank you,” “Thanks,” “Have a good weekend,” “Received,” “Appreciated,” “Have a good evening,” “Did you get/see this,” “Cheers,” “You too,” and “LOL,” according to the study. ....

One of the researchers, Mike Berners-Lee, a professor at Lancaster University in Lancashire, England, said in a statement: “Whilst the carbon footprint of an email isn’t huge, it’s a great illustration of the broader principle that cutting the waste out of our lives is good for our wellbeing and good for the environment.”

“Every time we take a small step towards changing our behavior, be that sending fewer emails or carrying a reusable coffee cup, we need to treat it as a reminder to ourselves and others that we care even more about the really big carbon decisions,” Berners-Lee said.

********UNQUOTE*****






8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Carbon footprint of EMAILS "ruining the environment" - but, *whew*!1, "isn't huge"!1 (Original Post) UTUSN Nov 2019 OP
interesting, thanks dweller Nov 2019 #1
Bwah HAH - forwarding *BY EMAIL*?!1 UTUSN Nov 2019 #2
yo ! dweller Nov 2019 #8
what a load of bullshit Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #3
Sure. Because those servers aren't even turned on until MineralMan Nov 2019 #4
Watching one cat video is the carbon equivalent of thousands of emails. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #6
Exactly. Pixels waste energy. MineralMan Nov 2019 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author MineralMan Nov 2019 #5

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,328 posts)
3. what a load of bullshit
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 03:14 PM
Nov 2019

Oops! My post is probably putting out more CO2 than 5000 trucks!

At least, according to a "leading energy supply company".

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
4. Sure. Because those servers aren't even turned on until
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 03:18 PM
Nov 2019

you send an email. People don't realize that they have to boot up for every email...

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
6. Watching one cat video is the carbon equivalent of thousands of emails.
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 03:21 PM
Nov 2019

Sending one physical mail is also the equivalent of thousands of emails.

Not really a rational concern.

Response to UTUSN (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Carbon footprint of EMAIL...