Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCarbon footprint of EMAILS "ruining the environment" - but, *whew*!1, "isn't huge"!1
So first they found another disastrous thing to worry us with, then say it ain't THAT bad. I can keep sending my email alerts about wingnuts!1
**********QUOTE*******
https://nypost.com/2019/11/26/your-emails-are-ruining-the-environment-study/
Your emails are ruining the environment: study
.... The study, commissioned by OVO Energy, Englands leading energy supply company, used the UK as a case study and found that one less thank you email a day would cut 16,433 tons of carbon caused by the high-energy servers used to send the online messages.
Thats the equivalent of 81,152 flights to Madrid or taking 3,334 diesel cars off the road, the research said. ....
The top 10 most unnecessary emails include: Thank you, Thanks, Have a good weekend, Received, Appreciated, Have a good evening, Did you get/see this, Cheers, You too, and LOL, according to the study. ....
One of the researchers, Mike Berners-Lee, a professor at Lancaster University in Lancashire, England, said in a statement: Whilst the carbon footprint of an email isnt huge, its a great illustration of the broader principle that cutting the waste out of our lives is good for our wellbeing and good for the environment.
Every time we take a small step towards changing our behavior, be that sending fewer emails or carrying a reusable coffee cup, we need to treat it as a reminder to ourselves and others that we care even more about the really big carbon decisions, Berners-Lee said.
********UNQUOTE*****
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 676 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Carbon footprint of EMAILS "ruining the environment" - but, *whew*!1, "isn't huge"!1 (Original Post)
UTUSN
Nov 2019
OP
dweller
(23,628 posts)1. interesting, thanks
forwarding to everybody in my address book
👍🏻
✌🏼
UTUSN
(70,683 posts)2. Bwah HAH - forwarding *BY EMAIL*?!1
✌🏼
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)3. what a load of bullshit
Oops! My post is probably putting out more CO2 than 5000 trucks!
At least, according to a "leading energy supply company".
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)4. Sure. Because those servers aren't even turned on until
you send an email. People don't realize that they have to boot up for every email...
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)6. Watching one cat video is the carbon equivalent of thousands of emails.
Sending one physical mail is also the equivalent of thousands of emails.
Not really a rational concern.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)7. Exactly. Pixels waste energy.
Response to UTUSN (Original post)
MineralMan This message was self-deleted by its author.