Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,786 posts)
Thu Nov 28, 2019, 01:19 AM Nov 2019

South Carolina's Social Security requirement stops people from voting, federal lawsuit alleges

South Carolina is one of just four states that will not let someone vote unless they disclose their full nine-digit Social Security number on voter registration applications.

And in an era of identity theft that makes people wary of giving out their full Social Security numbers, that requirement makes South Carolina one of an “extreme minority” of states and is unconstitutional because it keeps eligible people from voting, according to a lawsuit filed by a Washington D.C. law firm in South Carolina’s federal court Monday against state election officials.

“Any application that does not include a potential voter’s full Social Security number will be rejected and the person will not be permitted to vote,” the lawsuit alleges.

The lawsuit, filed by the S.C. Democratic Party and the national Senate and House Democratic congressional committees, seeks an injunction to stop the State Election Commission from requiring full Social Security number disclosure on voter registration forms.

The lawsuit also seeks a ruling on whether South Carolina’s requirement is legal.

State Elections Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said the agency does not “comment on pending litigation.”





https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/south-carolina/article237745849.html#storylink=cpy

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
South Carolina's Social Security requirement stops people from voting, federal lawsuit alleges (Original Post) RandySF Nov 2019 OP
The GOP is creative. I'd never have thought of all the ways they have to disenfranchise. Karadeniz Nov 2019 #1
they're trying to avoid showing their color chart ... Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #3
So, the agency doesn't "comment on pending litigation." Really convenient for them. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2019 #2
Even without the effect on voting, it sounds like an illegal use of S.S. numbers hvn_nbr_2 Nov 2019 #4

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,328 posts)
3. they're trying to avoid showing their color chart ...
Thu Nov 28, 2019, 02:50 AM
Nov 2019

Behind the scenes, they use the same chart as "news" uses for shooters. Substitute "voter" at the top, and "fraud" at the bottom:

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,595 posts)
2. So, the agency doesn't "comment on pending litigation." Really convenient for them.
Thu Nov 28, 2019, 01:23 AM
Nov 2019

Of course they don't want to comment! If they did, they would show just how wrong they are.



hvn_nbr_2

(6,486 posts)
4. Even without the effect on voting, it sounds like an illegal use of S.S. numbers
Thu Nov 28, 2019, 01:03 PM
Nov 2019

You're not allowed to require SS numbers for unrelated things.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»South Carolina's Social S...