General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWaPo's Margaret Sullivan: The real reason Chris Matthews had to go
By Margaret Sullivan
Media columnist
March 3, 2020 at 12:20 p.m. EST
<snip>
But this casual sexism wasnt at the heart of why he had to go. One of the most prominent and well-paid hosts in the cable-news game didnt listen, didnt do his homework, and treated politics as a game in which noisy confrontation was a necessity. The problem was less about green-room boorishness and far more about what you could see and hear on the air especially in recent weeks, but also going back a long way.
For years, Matthews was a harsh and misogynistic critic of Hillary Clinton once calling her a she-devil, and attributing any of her success in the 2008 presidential primary to the fact that, as he put it, her husband messed around. More recently, his comparison of Bernie Sanders winning the Nevada primary to the fall of France to the Nazis was a horribly offensive gaffe given Sanderss Jewish heritage and his having lost family members to the Holocaust.
But for me, an occasional member of the Hardball audience, there was something worse.
With his reported $5 million annual salary, he wielded enormous influence. For many years, he had the power to sway public opinion on the crucial topics of the day. Not infrequently, he failed the main test of someone in that role. He was ready to offer his own views, but not prepared to hear those of his guests or to bring deep knowledge to the conversation.
Frequently described as bombastic, and certainly an excitable yeller, Matthews had a tendency to ask a question, and then, just as his subject was beginning to answer, interrupt, asking it differently or inserting his own opinion.
</snip>
Brutal, but true...
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)Those frown lines, he must be a miserable crusty in private too?
He had overstayed, won't be missed, now about Mrs. Greenspan and Mr. Todd?
I literally have not watched his show in going on a decade.
He was horribly boorish, as noted talked over people after questions before they even had a chance to answer, and just generally was impossible to watch.
And, yes, Mrs. Greenspan and Todd have to go, too ...
dmr
(28,347 posts)There was an animated gif here back in the early days of DU where he repeatedly said "Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock ..." Mathews was obsessed with knocking the Clinton's. I hated that.
NoPasaran
(17,291 posts)I think it came originally from the late great Bartcop, who had absolutely no use for Tweety.
Upthevibe
(8,038 posts)(who was awful to Hillary) and Chuck Toad is horrible! I would have preferred them being gone over Matthews..
Backseat Driver
(4,390 posts)AZ8theist
(5,456 posts)But the LAST time I even bothered with his show was when, after Shrub made that speech at Ground Zero, Mathews blurted out "WE'RE ALL NEOCONS NOW!!!!"
Fuck you, asshole. I will NEVER be a fucking Neocon no matter what happens. I'm not that stupid.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)I found him tiresome. All that yelling, and his constant interruptions were tiresome. I usually switched the channel to something else. Even an old Law and Order rerun or anything on Animal Planet was better to watch.
I wonder how many advertisers were dropping him?
calimary
(81,220 posts)avoided the spittle shower that inevitably spewed out of his mouth while he yelled and bellowed and hyperventilated. And interrupted and talked over them. And fumfered his words.
SHEESH he blew so many pronunciations that my husband and I would start the what number of martinis did he have at lunch this time?
What? Did he just come back from a two-martini lunch?
Three, ya think?
Man, that must have been a FIVE-martini lunch. If he were stumbling over trash cans hed be in traction by now... Yeah. And he never did get the pronunciation right.
robbob
(3,527 posts)I learn something new every day here!
calimary
(81,220 posts)and wordplay. Hed use that one all the time, especially in the case of some air-talent who needed a dozen-or-more takes to get through a 30-second script.
I dont know if its the meaning or the onomatopoeia of it or if its even a legitimate word (much less how its spelled!). But it IS a fun word!
PCIntern
(25,534 posts)The last time I heard that was my moms Yiddish tirades at the TV when a RWer would be on. You took me back!
calimary
(81,220 posts)Whooda thunkit?
The stuff that launches a thousand blooper reels!
robbob
(3,527 posts)and looked it up. Definitely a real word, of Yiddish origin.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Yep. I learn something new every day here!
PCIntern
(25,534 posts)Yiddisha-mama.
calimary
(81,220 posts)and right outta Catholic school gave my virginity to a nice Jewish boy who worked at the local record store and never ate vegetables.
So whaddya want from me?!
I love it when you talk dirty!
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)The frequent interruptions and talking over his "guests" - made me wonder why anybody would ever want to be on his show. Matthews seemed to think that the only opinion that mattered was his own, and I found it irritating to the point where I just turned him off. Based on what's been posted here on DU it seems a lot of other people were doing the same. I don't know, maybe Chris Matthews mattered 30 years ago, but that was before the cable news format took over and he has never adapted.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)hopefully they(NBC)replace this slug with some one who can add to the betterment of Public Discussion.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)lame54
(35,285 posts)Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)Why are they any better covering political news than Democrats?
MSNBC seems to over value their comments.
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)...then Wallace and Scarborough and Steele and the rest of them will show their true colors: deep shades of red.
Then MSNBC will be indistinguishable from Fox for half the day.
czarjak
(11,269 posts)tenderfoot
(8,426 posts)It slays me how many on this site buy into their charade.
certainot
(9,090 posts)completely ignore it
at least the dems can plead ignorance for never hearing of talk radio or knowing anyone who listened to it
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)watch and see.
shanti
(21,675 posts)wasn't he punished for his lying by putting his show last?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)have been doing a Rejuvenation of Williams. Remember he still gets 25 million per year.
shanti
(21,675 posts)And Chris Matthews was only getting $5 mil per year?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Talents in the Business .
DownriverDem
(6,228 posts)paid his dues and will be back in the more reasonable time slot.
LisaM
(27,803 posts)It's a really common thing, and he's paid a really heavy price for it.
OTOH, I like his show best of all the MSNBC shows, and, since I'm on the West Coast, it's the one I'm most likely to watch live. He gets good guests who work well with him and each other, and I really learn a lot from his show.
He's also got a very wry sense of humor that I appreciate. Keep him where he is!
moonscape
(4,673 posts)Grasswire2
(13,568 posts)A review of the day's top political news, calm and witty. Great guests.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,784 posts)He came out as a Gay man, opposed much of the hard right opinions of the previous and current Fox hosts.
Give Shep a chance. People see the error of their ways and come out of the darkness.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Smith asked about coming out at a "company picnic"-type setting at Roger Ailes' house. Ailes flat-out told him no way. He's been bitter at them ever since.
In sports, how many times have you seen a former teammate almost singlehandedly defeat his old team? There's more determination and adrenaline involved.
Meadowoak
(5,545 posts)Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)demigoddess
(6,640 posts)I thought I was in an exclusive club of one. The main reason why I watched C. Matthews. Reagan jr. is a brilliant
political analyst. He belongs on MSNBC.
I thought I belonged to an exclusive club of one. Reagan jr. is a great analyst of political events.
He deserves to have more air time.
lame54
(35,285 posts)empedocles
(15,751 posts)BSdetect
(8,998 posts)randr
(12,410 posts)for him to get it, if ever.
pandr32
(11,579 posts)He never let a guest answer a question. As soon as they'd start to answer, he'd interrupt with another question. His guests might as well have been potted plants.
SharonAnn
(13,772 posts)PSPS
(13,591 posts)SaveOurDemocracy
(4,400 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)if more isn't at play here. I wish him well in his retirement, he's been on the news, since I was a teenager.
renate
(13,776 posts)If this is due to anything other than... well, I can't imagine what this would be due to, from a professional who's been on TV for 20 years, other than a sad cause that shouldn't be laughed at.
Not to dismiss the things he's been accused of. And just last week, attacking Elizabeth Warren over Mike Bloomberg's being accused of telling a woman to get an abortion, was totally weird and creepy.
But I also wonder whether there's something going on, and I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Well, on almost anyone. And I also wish him well, especially with respect to this.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)what he did, OTOH I understand he is from a different generation. I think of the behaviour of some in the 90's when I was younger and am shocked by what was accepted not to long ago.
renate
(13,776 posts)I just meant to acknowledge that there were valid reasons for his leaving other than a possible cognitive decline, but I thought the John Oliver clip was sad, not funny. Sorry for being unclear!
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)Of course you didn't, I found the clip sad as well.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)...in which, somehow in his head, he thought Jaime, who he was speaking to remotely, was actually on stage with Lindsey Graham at the same time?
That seemed, to me, to be a very serious conscious disconnect.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)Link to tweet
How, in his mind, did he actually think the man he was talking to was also standing next to Lindsey Graham in a live shot?
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)leftstreet
(36,106 posts)louis-t
(23,292 posts)No one.
Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)just didn't work anymore.
Also, I saw him be extremely cruel to guests on his show, really humiliating them if they disagreed with him.
I think he really enjoyed that demonstration of his hyper masculinity. Very "Mad Man" in style - so passe.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)"Frequently described as bombastic, and certainly an excitable yeller, Matthews had a tendency to ask a question, and then, just as his subject was beginning to answer, interrupt, asking it differently or inserting his own opinion."
Have never been able to stand the loudmouth boor.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)Paladin
(28,252 posts)He just wasn't up to the job anymore.
Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)Frequently described as bombastic, and certainly an excitable yeller, Matthews had a tendency to ask a question, and then, just as his subject was beginning to answer, interrupt, asking it differently or inserting his own opinion.
Chris, if you just want to hear yourself talk, why bother having guests? Everything that Margaret Sullivan said was spot on.
However, in some ways, Chuck Todd is twice as insufferable as Chris Matthews ever was when it comes to not knowing a topic, with letting Republicans getting away with Republican talking points that are demonstrably untrue, and with deliberately asking cheap "gotcha" questions of Democrats that he would never ask of Republicans. Matthews had all kinds of problems. Chuck Todd is a walking, talking disaster.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)He's like having a double-agent on your team. Just want him gone gone gone!
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)Maya Wiley is good too.
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)While Joy Reid is great, it's inexcusable that she's the only black women on the station with her own show.
katmondoo
(6,454 posts)misanthrope
(7,411 posts)"One of the most prominent and well-paid hosts in the cable-news game didnt listen, didnt do his homework, and treated politics as a game in which noisy confrontation was a necessity. "
In short, he wasn't that good at his job and certainly didn't approach it like a professional.
Boomer
(4,168 posts)Like others on this thread, I would be sorry to hear if something has recently gone wrong with his health, mental or otherwise, but I've found Matthews unwatchable for years.
TimeToGo
(1,366 posts)"didnt do his homework, and treated politics as a game in which noisy confrontation was a necessity"
This can't be true, because it defines almost every other political show on cable.
bucolic_frolic
(43,132 posts)I rarely watched him. It was more argument for argument's sake than any real information. Always left feeling brutalized, for years I thought him a conservative.
With HardBall you got confrontation. With Meet the Press you get Republican softball.
For all its alleged liberal slant, MSNBC still has problems delivering a semblance of reality.
mahina
(17,646 posts)Unwatchable for me.
Azathoth
(4,607 posts)It's as simple as that. His hypomanic shouting routine and often-absurd opinions had nothing to do with it. He got grandfathered in because he was cable news opinion before there was cable news opinion.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,413 posts)face will be interesting.
capechacon
(91 posts)Oh dear, oh dear...an outspoken, experienced host wasn't always as polite and deferential as he should have been.
Well too bad...I didn't always agree with Chris Mathews and found his frequent habit of talking "over" guests to be irritating. Nevertheless, he was a hugely experienced, (usually) reasonable voice who was not afraid to bluntly express his honest opinion to both his audience and his guests. He show also often included visitors with opinions at variance with his own.
Mathews was hardly perfect. But he was an outspoken, respected, basically reasonable and venerable political personality. He deserved better than to have been abruptly cashiered as he was yesterday.
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)Still looking for a second ... Waiting ...
I agree with the OP. It wasn't so much that the man was a misogynistic, mean spirited bully .. but on top of that he was ill-informed, not terribly astute, and not very good at his JOB! And it was the latter rather than the former that led to his ouster. Long overdue.
(comparing a Democratic caucus to the Nazis rolling into France is not a matter of being bombastic .. it's a matter of being a "danger to yourself and others" sh** for brains.)
capechacon
(91 posts)to disagree.
More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)If they'd fired him, someone else would have been ready to take over after the commercial break.
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,998 posts)ancianita
(36,023 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)how WDC politics works.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)They both bring humor into hard-edged discussion, also. As much a Matthews, only funnier and not at the expense of commenters.
Grasswire2
(13,568 posts)ancianita
(36,023 posts)Grasswire2
(13,568 posts)That's my opinion, and my reason.
Reader Rabbit
(2,624 posts)That was just downright unprofessional, and creepy AF.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)I remember him getting swoony over the codpiece
Nitram
(22,791 posts)mjvpi
(1,388 posts)Why have smart people on a talk show just to take up space between you own points of view?
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)He actually said that last summer at one of his live on-location shows.
I figured he was joking, be he really meant it.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)And yelling long ago. Pundits shouting their changing opinions over and over are worn out.
Scarborough needs to be the next one to go. His show is stale and tired.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)good riddance.
marble falls
(57,077 posts)until then.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)catrose
(5,065 posts)Democrats_win
(6,539 posts)Matthews was obnoxious but not very funny or effective.
If they want obnoxious give me someone who has a biting humor like Samantha Bee or Stephanie Miller. That's what we need during the Trump Sh*t show.
kairos12
(12,852 posts)Trueblue Texan
(2,426 posts)...interrupt, asking it differently or inserting his own opinion.
That wasn't a "tendency," it was his TRADEMARK and made him unwatchable from my perspective. I suspect few will miss him.
Paladin
(28,252 posts)If Donahue isn't thinking that, he ought to be.
infullview
(981 posts)For whatever you all say you hate about Chris Matthews, it was clear that the staff at MSNBC were pretty broken up about what happened. I think it was Steve Kornacki who filled in for Matthews and was in tears at the end of the show.
Raine
(30,540 posts)contradicted his guests and sometimes even himself in what he had previously said!
Raven123
(4,828 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)?
However, his treatment of Hillary Clinton as described in the article and the tingling comment convinced me that Matthews is unprofessional, to put it mildly, and unworthy of my time and attention.
TygrBright
(20,758 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)Still, Matthews managed to draw 1.5 million total viewers, ahead of Burnett (964,000) but still well behind MacCallum (2.7 million). That means the 74-year-olds audience skewed a little long in the tooth.
https://www.thewrap.com/chris-matthews-hardball-ratings-last-place-msnbc/
People complain when the top BBC news presenter gets under £500,000 - about $700,000: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48839428 . His usual timeslot gets about 3.5 million viewers.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Fine line between being a tough interviewer cutting through BS and just an asshole who is waiting to talk.
Goodheart
(5,321 posts)"Frequently described as bombastic, and certainly an excitable yeller, Matthews had a tendency to ask a question, and then, just as his subject was beginning to answer, interrupt, asking it differently or inserting his own opinion. "
What I said last night:
"he asks a question then doesn't let the interviewee fully respond without giving his own take to his own question. "
Or maybe his awful interview skills were just too damn obvious?
Demovictory9
(32,449 posts)yep. stopped listening to him years ago. can't stand his "interview style"
More Republican refugees please.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)90-percent
(6,829 posts)From this link: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2008/03/iraq-follies/
I vividly remember the propaganda being catapulted by GWB and Rummy and all those other PNAC imbeciles. I discovered DU during the Bush v. Gore unconstitutional tragedy and my bristling over republic corruption and lies following 9-11, when Cheney said we have to get those bastards that did this to us. I remember the good reporting links on DU at the time and the great Keith Olbermann's fearless journalism.
I also remember Chris as a cheerleader for the Iraq invasion, swept up in the fervor and deceit of the GWB administration. The first year or two he was enthusiastic about it and supported it. I remember all the false and misleading propaganda and "Americans better watch what they say" and Cheney stove piping bullshit to Judith Miller and then he could speak openly about classified info because it had been published in the NY Times.
It was frightening to watch the break down of journalistic ethics pretty much across the spectrum of MSM. I knew we were sliding into an invasion based on lies and it was unstoppable, so why not get on the bandwagon and worry about consequences later?
The gullibility and lack of integrity and ethics confirmed to me IT CAN HAPPEN HERE. And that is made easier by the likes of Matthews in MSM. Won't get fooled again? Not quite, more like will get fooled again and again and again and again.
And the end result; America is literally a full blown DICTATORSHIP with a moronic psycho bitch from hell having finally wrecked the gift our Founding Fathers gave us.
Good riddance to him and his kind.
-90% Jimmy
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)I'm dancing on his virtual grave.
Liberal In Texas
(13,548 posts)Supposedly there's a reason why the guest was invited on and it is REAL annoying to only hear a brief first part of an answer before the host or anchor breaks back in with some opinion or another question.
He's not the only one that does this. Stephanie Miller is notorious for interrupting guests. I really really like to hear what Malcolm Nance says when he is on her show once a week, but she keeps interrupting him before he can get to the salient point he tries to make.
Maybe this is just the "new and improved" way of doing radio and TV. Keep things moving or something. But I hate it.