Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQUESTION: Has there been an established R0 for Corona virus since China's partial quarantine lift?
Sounds like the R0 is the rate a contagion is being spread or infects people.
What is the rate now for corona virus?
How does it match other outbreaks in the past?
thx in advance
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 536 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
QUESTION: Has there been an established R0 for Corona virus since China's partial quarantine lift? (Original Post)
uponit7771
Mar 2020
OP
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)1. JAMA data has 3.58 from China
I believe Italy is higher
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)3. That's horrid, any link? thx in advance
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)6. Here
https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-020-00640-3?utm_source=sn&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=null&utm_campaign=BSLB_4_CA01_GL_BSLB_USG_CA01_GL_LSGR_PubH_Coronavirus_LandingPage&fbclid=IwAR3WLM8ZrK8BjQZfjx7H7UvTfFSoH5fb80OXmqfJv_lXdtXDUGVwrChTqzE
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762130?fbclid=IwAR3SrO5xUjqi3IZU6xFrgYS1ltRnZDtbWaBgefpRGsvUwijJLMfjtSuopk8
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762130?fbclid=IwAR3SrO5xUjqi3IZU6xFrgYS1ltRnZDtbWaBgefpRGsvUwijJLMfjtSuopk8
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)7. Thx, looks like these are from late Feb but even if its half of those numbers that's still horrible.
... So it looks like this virus is very contagious
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)2. No it's seems to be anywhere from 2.8 to about 6.
I know someone will come along and say that is wrong, but this thing is ridiculously contagious.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)4. +1, even half of 2.8 is pretty bad !!
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)5. I know, it also seems that every other person happens
to be a super spreader..insane.