Richard Burr ran a fairly bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee with Mark Warner

[coti]

They put out multiple reports that honestly described Russia's interference in the 2016 election and more.

The third of five volumes on Russian interference was released just last month, a summary of which can be found here:

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/senate-intel-releases-bipartisan-report-obama-admin-response-russian-election-interference

Now, why do you think Rebootlickans are so vocally focused in on one of their own (while ignoring others in their party who are equally criminal)?

[RockRaven]

1. Burr didn't "Nunes" as well as he was supposed to...

That said, it looks crooked. They all look crooked.

But he should get a chance to explain, as should DiFi and the rest.

[coti]

2. Oh, I'm sure it was crooked.

But it's convenient that Trump would call for his resignation- and no one else's. He hasn't liked Burr working in the Senate Intelligence Committee as he has for years now.

[LuvLoogie]

3. He also said that he didn't see any Russian connection to the trump campaign

or administration. He voted to acquit trump in the impeachment trial.

[coti]

4. He allowed for a Senate Intelligence Committee report that said the opposite, and in great detail

And that's just one of the more recent attacks/investigations on Trump and/or Russia by the SIC.

[greyl]

5. He toed the line to hold the power to blur the line. nt

[liberalmuse]

6. If Fox News is jumping on this.

It’s likely a smear job. Trump promised his job to someone in the Senate who sold their soul to him.