Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FoxNewsSucks

(10,429 posts)
Fri Mar 20, 2020, 09:49 AM Mar 2020

Remember the $1.5 TRILLION given to banks

just a short time ago? Rushed through, unlike the foot-dragging and arguing over the relative pittance being considered for working people?

What if that had been given to Americans instead. I wondered about that the last few days.

There are 128 million households in the US as of 2019. Source-- [link:https://www.statista.com/statistics/183635/number-of-households-in-the-us/|

Divide the $1,500,000,000,000 up among all US households and every single one would have gotten $11,718.

Every household in the US. Instead of quietly handing it over to banks, every household could have been given almost $12k and told to stay home 3 months. Rent, mortgage, car payments, utilities etc all would not be a worry like it is now.

Whatever payment they do end up passing for relief, it needs to be set up as a per-household payment, not per person. Single people and couples have the same housing costs as those with several kids.

Instead of bailing out cruise ships, the money should go to state unemployment funds to pay out immediate unemployment benefits. Those funds are based on employer-paid taxes calculated on the amount of payroll. No payroll means no money going into the fund.

Instead of bailing out airlines, distribute that money to state food programs, SNAP or others, which will ensure families can get whatever they need from grocery stores.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember the $1.5 TRILLION given to banks (Original Post) FoxNewsSucks Mar 2020 OP
That number was for overnight loans called repurchase agreements that are... Lucky Luciano Mar 2020 #1
THIS! I am so tired of people making support of repo operations out to be a handout Amishman Mar 2020 #2

Lucky Luciano

(11,253 posts)
1. That number was for overnight loans called repurchase agreements that are...
Fri Mar 20, 2020, 10:10 AM
Mar 2020

...collateralized by US Treasury bonds. Those loans need to be renewed every day. Repos always trade, but there were not enough repos and the Fed stepped in with extra loans for the balance needed to satisfy demand.

Without repos, treasury liquidity dries up dramatically which means the US can’t sell its bonds and can’t fund itself. Ruh Roh.

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
2. THIS! I am so tired of people making support of repo operations out to be a handout
Fri Mar 20, 2020, 10:20 AM
Mar 2020

It is a fully collateralized ultra short term loan that in the long run ends up turning a small profit for the Fed with effectively zero risk. If the financial institution doesn't repay it, the Fed keeps the bonds - which ends up being an indirect profit for our government as we no longer have the interest going out for the maturation of those bonds

repo operations are not a gift

repo operations are not a bailout

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember the $1.5 TRILLIO...