Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,425 posts)
Sun Mar 22, 2020, 02:04 AM Mar 2020

The 2006 Pandemic and All Hazards Preparadness Act?

Anyone heard of this? Authored by Senator Richard Burr?

I was reading about his stock selling and it described Burr as the “Senate leading authority on pandemics.”

What was this act about? Should it have prepared us for this?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 2006 Pandemic and All Hazards Preparadness Act? (Original Post) question everything Mar 2020 OP
Part of the act was to establish Office of the Assistant Sec'ty for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) pat_k Mar 2020 #1
Thanks. We can only hope that once this is over, the last government officials question everything Mar 2020 #2

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
1. Part of the act was to establish Office of the Assistant Sec'ty for Preparedness and Response (ASPR)
Sun Mar 22, 2020, 02:32 AM
Mar 2020

Apparently Robert Kadlec, current ASPR has been more focused on these threats:

- Deployment of bio-weapons
- Release of chemical weapons


Even though the word "Pandemic" is in the title "Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act," it seems that there is a culture -- and has been for some time (predating Trump) -- to focus on terrorism, terrorism, terrorism, over preparedness for national/global infectious disease.

Website makes it all sound great, but I'm not finding much about concrete substantive action.

From Wikipedia page on the act:

In January 2018, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee held two separate hearings on the reauthorization of the PAHPA law. The conclusion from many witnesses who testified before the hearings is that "decreased and episodic funding from the United States government has stakeholders questioning the true commitment federal lawmakers have for sustaining the nation's preparedness and response capabilities during a catastrophic event linked to infectious diseases, natural disasters or chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) agents."[2]

question everything

(47,425 posts)
2. Thanks. We can only hope that once this is over, the last government officials
Sun Mar 22, 2020, 02:38 AM
Mar 2020

and legislators remain standing will revisit the act and will give it real teeth.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 2006 Pandemic and All...