Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBurr sued over controversial stock sales
https://www.wral.com/coronavirus/burr-sued-over-controversial-stock-sales/19026735/WASHINGTON A shareholder in Wyndham Hotels is suing U.S. Sen. Richard Burr over the North Carolina Republican's decision to sell up to $150,000 of Wyndham stock last month before the coronavirus outbreak caused the stock to lose more than half of its value.
Alan Jacobson accused Burr in the federal lawsuit, which was filed Monday, of violating the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge, or STOCK, Act. Congress passed the measure in 2012, making it illegal for members to profit financially from inside information they receive. Burr was one of only three senators to vote against it.
Burr unloaded up to $1.7 million in publicly traded stocks on Feb. 13, weeks before the stock market cratered over the growing coronavirus outbreak.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 770 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (24)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Burr sued over controversial stock sales (Original Post)
zackymilly
Mar 2020
OP
SWBTATTReg
(22,114 posts)1. Good. All of these congressional scumbags that used this insider knowledge should pay the ...
price.
CurtEastPoint
(18,640 posts)2. womp womp, asshole.... womp womp
MagickMuffin
(15,936 posts)3. And he Voted AGAINST the STOCK Act.
How fitting, no wonder he voted against it.
Stuart G
(38,420 posts)4. That stock sale is going to cost Richard Burr more than he has ever imagined.
TomSlick
(11,097 posts)5. Based on a very quick scan of the STOCK Act - a VERY quick scan.
I don't see where the Act creates a private cause of action by an investor for violations by a covered official. I suspect the Complaint will draw a motion to dismiss for failure to allege a cause of action. Then again, I'm a cynical old defense lawyer.