Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zackymilly

(2,375 posts)
Tue Mar 24, 2020, 01:33 PM Mar 2020

Burr sued over controversial stock sales

https://www.wral.com/coronavirus/burr-sued-over-controversial-stock-sales/19026735/

WASHINGTON — A shareholder in Wyndham Hotels is suing U.S. Sen. Richard Burr over the North Carolina Republican's decision to sell up to $150,000 of Wyndham stock last month before the coronavirus outbreak caused the stock to lose more than half of its value.

Alan Jacobson accused Burr in the federal lawsuit, which was filed Monday, of violating the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge, or STOCK, Act. Congress passed the measure in 2012, making it illegal for members to profit financially from inside information they receive. Burr was one of only three senators to vote against it.

Burr unloaded up to $1.7 million in publicly traded stocks on Feb. 13, weeks before the stock market cratered over the growing coronavirus outbreak.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Burr sued over controversial stock sales (Original Post) zackymilly Mar 2020 OP
Good. All of these congressional scumbags that used this insider knowledge should pay the ... SWBTATTReg Mar 2020 #1
womp womp, asshole.... womp womp CurtEastPoint Mar 2020 #2
And he Voted AGAINST the STOCK Act. MagickMuffin Mar 2020 #3
That stock sale is going to cost Richard Burr more than he has ever imagined. Stuart G Mar 2020 #4
Based on a very quick scan of the STOCK Act - a VERY quick scan. TomSlick Mar 2020 #5

TomSlick

(11,097 posts)
5. Based on a very quick scan of the STOCK Act - a VERY quick scan.
Tue Mar 24, 2020, 11:28 PM
Mar 2020

I don't see where the Act creates a private cause of action by an investor for violations by a covered official. I suspect the Complaint will draw a motion to dismiss for failure to allege a cause of action. Then again, I'm a cynical old defense lawyer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Burr sued over controvers...