General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCorporations can issue stock to raise money instead of grifting the government.
Corporations issue stock to raise money.
Unless there is something that is preventing them from issuing stock (shareholder greed, CEO greed, etc.), a corporation should be issuing stock to raise money instead of taking handouts from the government.
underpants
(182,788 posts)Its been done before
unblock
(52,205 posts)that said, lenders are tightening up and asking for wider spreads.
most businesses don't understand the concept of a rainy day fund.
3Hotdogs
(12,374 posts)Quemado
(1,262 posts)Definition of Treasury Stock
Treasury stock is usually a corporation's previously issued shares of common stock that have been purchased from the stockholders, but the corporation has not retired the shares. The number of shares of treasury stock (or treasury shares) is the difference between the number of shares issued and the number of shares outstanding. Since the treasury shares result in fewer shares outstanding, there may be a slight increase in the corporation's earnings per share.
Treasury Stock is also the title of a general ledger account that will have a debit balance equal to the cost of the repurchased shares being held by the corporation. The corporation's cost of treasury stock reduces the corporation's cash and the total amount of stockholders' equity.
The shares of treasury stock will not receive dividends, will not have voting rights, and cannot result in an income statement gain or loss. The shares of treasury stock can be sold, retired, or could continue to be held as treasury stock.
Source: https://www.accountingcoach.com/blog/what-is-treasury-stock
Make7
(8,543 posts)unblock
(52,205 posts)they'd hate to raise money at $45 per share when the stock was just $70 per share a month ago. they figure they're getting a terrible price and putting more stock out there usually makes the share price go down even more.
if a company didn't really need the money, they'd have all kinds of reasons not to bother.
if a company really did need the money, then this would cause notable problems. first, it would invite additional investor/rating agency scrutiny, which could very well downgrade the company, which would make the stock fall even more.
that sort of thing could trigger even more problem, possibly breaching other lending covenants or causing investors to pull out, etc.
in some cases it could even lead to a bankruptcy or hostile takeover.
if a company really had a liquidity issue, it would look first to cutting costs (if only temporarily) and/or borrowing first.
i'll agree that most ceo's incentives don't encourage them to issue shares in such situations, but there are reasons that go beyond just that.
the real problem is that there aren't incentives to keep the large cash cushion that accumulates in good times. instead they have an incentive to buy back shares or issue special dividends or spend on acquisitions, leaving them lean and less able to cope with surprises.
Quemado
(1,262 posts)Didn't Mitt Romney say that corporations are people, too?
keithbvadu2
(36,783 posts)Whatever money they get from the gov't should be exchanged for current stock at current price.
TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)At a 52 week average price or something like that. Its supposed to be emergency help after all, but the idea that they just get money after they were irresponsible and we get nothing doesnt sit well with me.
Eko
(7,281 posts)So they don't have stocks to sell.