Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
Thu Mar 26, 2020, 03:14 PM Mar 2020

Will this Coronavirus Disaster establish a new vetting standard for candidates?

We didn't have the experience before to even know that this question had to be asked of every candidate that runs for office: "Would you put the economy's health ahead of human life?" But I think it should now be standard.

Lots of follow-up questions. "If you decided that the economy was more important would you take responsibility for the lives that were lost because of your decision?"

It's important, because now we don't just have Trump stating that he's not responsible for the failures of preparation and he's now ready to double down with his Easter surprise; but we also have Gov. Mike Parson (R-MO) refusing to shut down his own state and not willing to accept responsibility for the deaths that might happen.

I think it's important for voters to understand what they are voting for.

Reference: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1002&pid=13178837

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will this Coronavirus Disaster establish a new vetting standard for candidates? (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Mar 2020 OP
I hope so. Jane Austin Mar 2020 #1
They'd just lie if they are greedy sociopaths. nt tblue37 Mar 2020 #2
There's a whole LIST of 2naSalit Mar 2020 #3
Christ. Really. Baitball Blogger Mar 2020 #5
We should develop an new 2naSalit Mar 2020 #7
This was predictable. All of it. Baitball Blogger Mar 2020 #9
if you haven't already dweller Mar 2020 #10
I think every candidate should pass a top secret background check XRubicon Mar 2020 #4
For a start, how do we make it compulsive to know a candidate's tax returns? Baitball Blogger Mar 2020 #6
I think they should volunteer to do it XRubicon Mar 2020 #8

Jane Austin

(9,199 posts)
1. I hope so.
Thu Mar 26, 2020, 03:48 PM
Mar 2020

They should all be as smart as - or at least as well-informed as our Dem candidates.

I started to say as Elizabeth Warren, then realized that would be impossible.

2naSalit

(86,524 posts)
7. We should develop an new
Thu Mar 26, 2020, 04:17 PM
Mar 2020

Last edited Thu Mar 26, 2020, 06:38 PM - Edit history (1)

manner of maintaining our democracy. This got way out of hand. No more underhanded BS. I hope we can figure out a way to prompt future generations to rediscover compassion and respect.

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
9. This was predictable. All of it.
Thu Mar 26, 2020, 04:38 PM
Mar 2020

The Chamber of Commerce use to have an exercise which involved dividing a group of people into three groups. My friend told me about this. She participated in the exercise. One group was defined as the wealthy, the second as the teachers and health workers and the third as the poor. The wealthy were allowed access to coffee and a table of pastries that were in the room. It was determined that the wealthy could invite others to the food and drink if they wished.

And then the three groups were sent to three different rooms to assess how they wanted the exercise to "evolve" based on their qualities. When the poor group made it into the room, they discovered an empty room. No chairs, no tables.

When the groups again reconvened, the person monitoring the exercise asked what everyone determined. Mostly, questions were asked to get a full understanding of their group's power and ability or limitations. The monitor answered their questions, explaining that there were consequences to their decisions. And then the monitor told them that they were to go back into their respective room to determined what would happen next. When the poor group got up, they stole the chairs in the conference room to have something to sit on.

When the groups again reconvened, the wealthy group had penalties set up for the poor for stealing the chairs. They seemed to enjoy using their power to inflict hardships on the other groups. They even withheld food from the poor eventually "killing" a few from starvation.

I don't know where the pandemic twist came in, but the wealthy were so annoyed with the poor group that they tied the hands of the health service group from helping the poor to ensure that they would only provide assistance to the wealthy.

By the end of the day, only the members of the wealthy group survived.

Which, I might add, would not really happen that way because viruses don't discriminate based on financial portfolios.

The Chamber of Commerce said that of all the times they conducted the exercise they had never seen such dire results. That was in the nineties and that kind Highlander exhibition reflected what I felt was going on in my community.

XRubicon

(2,212 posts)
4. I think every candidate should pass a top secret background check
Thu Mar 26, 2020, 04:06 PM
Mar 2020

When they win their parties nomination or maybe earlier.

I would bet trump couldn't pass this check.

XRubicon

(2,212 posts)
8. I think they should volunteer to do it
Thu Mar 26, 2020, 04:22 PM
Mar 2020

The top secret background check would look at finances and everything else too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will this Coronavirus Dis...