General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCOVID-19 estimation updates have some 'good' news
It looks better this morning --for many states. http://www.healthdata.org/covid/updates
The overall death rate is still painfully high. And New York still faces many hard days.
But it's still a glimmer of hope. In my tiny state, it suggests we may be past the peak of this wave.
Here's a link to find your state
https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections
Squinch
(50,949 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)snpsmom
(677 posts)janterry
(4,429 posts)as does this one:
http://www.healthdata.org/covid/faqs
All models make certain assumptions and they disclose these on those pages. If you find a statistical or theoretical weakness, it would be good to make note of it. The researchers are in dialogue with other models and modelers - as well.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)That's nuts.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Less than 100,000 will die from this disease. However, there may be a second wave.
janterry
(4,429 posts)We need that serological test to see who has been exposed and has likely developed immunity.
gab13by13
(21,318 posts)which amounts to 0.5% of our population. No one would have ever imagined that we would need to test so many people.
How can even the experts make models when the US has done so few tests?
janterry
(4,429 posts)aid in making some of those statistical assumptions.
But we absolutely need more widespread testing. I'm most interested in that serological test. My understanding is that it is less expensive (under 10/per person) and lets us know who has had the illness and who currently is infectious.
Tribetime
(4,685 posts)Based on your estimate
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,058 posts)The reporting has been odd every Sunday, perhaps some hospitals don't report their Sunday numbers until Monday. We've seen it 3 weeks in a row only to get smashed on Monday.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)When they only test people in a high risk category. Chances are the true death rate is lower.
These are the testing requirements at the hospital in my area.
"At least one of the following is present, potentially attributable to a respiratory viral illness:
Fever
Sore Throat
Cough
Shortness of Breath
Muscle Aches
And at least one of the following:
Is a patient in the hospital
Emergency department patient requiring admission
High risk patients*
Health care workers and first responders
*High Risk is defined as:
Age ≥ 60
Severe chronic lung disease (e.g. asthma, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, COPD, etc.)
Severe heart disease
Immunocompromised (those with weakened immune systems)
On immunocompromising medications (e.g. prednisone, chemotherapy, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, tacrolimus, TNF inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, etc.)
Living in a congregate setting (e.g. long-term care facilities, group homes, assisted living facilities, jails, shelters, etc.)"
Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)But i see peaks lower and later than they were before. Still hard times ahead for all, just not ration medical resources hard.
janterry
(4,429 posts)It's a model, of course. And models are models.
What I worry about most is that there is no game plan. For any state. Once we get past the peak - will testing be ramped up?
We need that serological test brought up to scale NOW.
Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)so they could take steps the day we had our first case.
Sometime in the next week or so, they will start testing the population at large to get a feel for how representative the current testing is (much of the positive population it catches, in which areas). They are talking about a slow return to normal so that we can back off if cases start rising.
But your basic point is a good one. None of that is possible if we don't have read access to multiple varieties of testing on demand.
Hela
(440 posts)I'm worried that people are getting the wrong message and are already easing up on social distancing. Numbers aren't blowing up here yet and people already think we are over the hump.
I went to a Walmart northeast of Indianapolis yesterday to pick up a grocery order, about 10 minutes from my house. The parking lot was slammed and looked like it was close to 80% of a normal weekend day. Traffic was close to a normal Sunday as well -- it was nowhere near as empty as it was 2 weeks ago when our first stay-at-home order came out. People picking up fast food, more than a dozen cars at Walgreens, and all the grocery stores (Aldi, Walmart, Kroger) with very full parking lots.
I have also observed neighbors congregating in groups of 12 or more at the end of driveways, with 8-10 adults talking at what we used to consider a normal distance and 3-4 kids running around with their dog. One woman even had an infant with her -- yikes. Nobody was wearing a mask or gloves or making any effort to stay at least 6 feet away from other people.
I'll be interested to see if Indiana extends the statewide order past April 21 (Indianapolis has one in place until April 30) and what happens to the numbers 2-3 weeks after that.
StarryNite
(9,443 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)The increase in the rate of increase has been slowing.
If we can reduce the rate of increase to zero, then we can work on reversing the increase to a decrease.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)You accelerate from a traffic light. Speed goes up quickly
But you see a few blocks down the road the light is turning yellow.
You let up on the gas, but not all the way
Your speed is still increasing but nowhere near as much
Soon you let off the gas and the car coasts at a constant speed for a bit
Then engine braking kicks in and speed starts dropping
kpete
(71,986 posts)Hela
(440 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)jimfields33
(15,786 posts)I mean they have Wyoming at less the a thousand deaths. Theyve had none!
stillcool
(32,626 posts)They have 0 deaths. What's so negative about numbers?
https://coronavirus.1point3acres.com/en