General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"A little SOCIALISM" or "possibly get coronavirus"? Conservatives say the choice is clear, but...
Last edited Tue Apr 7, 2020, 08:52 AM - Edit history (1)
Several weeks later...
The mass shutdowns are an unprecedented experiment on Americans that is destroying our national fabric, Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, a group that fashions itself a conservative watchdog but acts more as a communications shop for the rights messaging, tweeted Friday. The experiment must end. At this rate, we will have 30 million unemployed Americans by the end of the month. You cant cure a pandemic by killing an economy. On Friday, Fitton was back to blaming governors for strangling our economy.
...
Meanwhile, the conservative Phyllis Schlafly Eagles didnt waste the opportunity to warn Americans about the perils of socialized medicine. In their column Tuesday, Dems Push Socialized Medicine to Exploit Crisis, John and Andy Schlafly, sons of the late Phyllis Schlafly, argue that Democratic governors like New Yorks Andrew Cuomo and Michigans Gretchen Whitmer are trying to impose socialized medicine on Americans by restricting the use of the drug hydroxychloroquine. Many of the restrictions on the drug are meant to reserve its use for controlled studies to see whether it could be used to treat coronavirus patients and to prevent hoardingnot to mention ensure its safe use. (After Trump touted the unproven drug as a cure for COVID-19, people began searching for the drug, and one man who consumed a fish tank cleaner with the same active ingredient died.)
On Friday, Charlie Kirk, founder and president of Turning Point USA, fretted, we are now setting the precedent of the government on a massive scale sending direct checks to people because of a time of crisis. As Right Wing Watch reported, Kirk noted that such a relief package could show that programs like Medicare for All arent impossibleand perhaps even affordable. Kirk appeared to suggest that it was time for the U.S. to go back to work, noting to his co-host, Heres the long and short of it is that middle America, real small business relief, the best stimulus they could have, Michael, is the green light to go back to work.
https://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/as-u-s-economy-falters-right-wing-groups-warn-of-socialism-call-for-u-s-to-go-back-to-work/
Decisions, decisions...
dawg day
(7,947 posts)Pumping $ into the economy in a time of crisis isn't "socialism". It's Keynesian-- the perfectly sensible idea that money that Americans spend in the American economy will keep the economy flowing, get people back to work, keep businesses alive.
It's not like the money evaporates or gets stuck in some investment account (which is exactly what happens when Republicans engage in "wealth socialism," that is, giving big tax cuts to rich people).
S.E. TN Liberal
(508 posts)... wealthy, you would be correct.
Since the money comes from taxpayers, through the government, it is actually Socialism.
The best result would happen if the wealty were made to pay for their own bailouts. Make the banks and other businesses create their own insurance programs which they can draw upon in economic bad times and leave taxpayers alone.
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)All problems are caused by socialism, all correctives involve more free market capitalism.
ck4829
(35,062 posts)It's Schrodinger's ideology.
underpants
(182,774 posts)I mean, that IS the alternative.
S.E. TN Liberal
(508 posts)..fails time and time again, and always has to bailed out by Socialism at huge expense.
It would by cheaper to just let Socialists run things and the majority of the people would be far better off.
ProfessorGAC
(65,000 posts)Mad dash to front of line!