Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,380 posts)
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 04:55 PM Apr 2020

Democratic governors are largely leading the fight against COVID-19 -- while Republicans fall behind

There are three factors that seem to drive the casualty rates among states for COVID-19: (1) how early did infections start; (2) how dense and populous is the State; and (3) the speed of the State in responding to the first reports of infection.

https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america

While the larger States tend to be hit hard, since they tend to have both early reports of infection, plus density, the third factor is pivotal in explaining why California is currently expect to have less deaths than states like Georgia, Texas and Florida, which are less populous than California and they had more time to respond from the first reports of infection. In each case, Republican governors delayed their response in an effort to stay consistent with Trump's own delayed response.

https://www.alternet.org/2020/04/democratic-governors-are-largely-leading-the-fight-against-covid-19-while-republicans-fall-behind/

While the coronavirus pandemic is a national and international concern, state and local officials find themselves on the front lines of the public health battle.

Governors, in particular, have been in the spotlight in recent weeks. New York’s Andrew Cuomo has been praised by news outlets for his leadership at the epicenter of the U.S. outbreak, while others have been criticized for slow responses.

* * *
But the coronavirus has put some governors in an ideologically compromising position. Republicans, who traditionally advocated for states’ rights, now find themselves deferring to the federal government.

Meanwhile, Democrats are leading the nation on pandemic responses and reaping the political rewards. They are also pushing for more federal coordination efforts, especially in obtaining high-demand medical supplies.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic governors are largely leading the fight against COVID-19 -- while Republicans fall behind (Original Post) TomCADem Apr 2020 OP
Iowa and Minnesota have quite a contrast - Iowa Republican governor rurallib Apr 2020 #1
I tell ya Windy City Charlie Apr 2020 #2
Michigan, New York and New Jersey are trying hard jimfields33 Apr 2020 #3
NY and NJ Were The Among The First To Get Hit... TomCADem Apr 2020 #6
We keep waiting for something in Florida but nothing does jimfields33 Apr 2020 #7
I think poverty is another important factor in addition to your three. KY_EnviroGuy Apr 2020 #4
We are fortunate to have John Bel Edwards at the helm in Louisiana localroger Apr 2020 #5

rurallib

(62,371 posts)
1. Iowa and Minnesota have quite a contrast - Iowa Republican governor
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:04 PM
Apr 2020

and our plan seems to be to do little.

Up in Minnesota a state twice our size is testing more, has fewer cases and seems to be getting some control of the situation.

Windy City Charlie

(1,178 posts)
2. I tell ya
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:08 PM
Apr 2020

Not there's anything good at all about this virus, but if something good has come out of the virus, it has shown the ones who can genuinely lead, and the ones who don't have a clue. It goes back to the adage, what separate the doers from the rest is not how they handle things when things go right, but when they go wrong.

jimfields33

(15,642 posts)
3. Michigan, New York and New Jersey are trying hard
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:10 PM
Apr 2020

They also have majority of the deaths. A tough job for those Governors. They are in charge thankfully.

TomCADem

(17,380 posts)
6. NY and NJ Were The Among The First To Get Hit...
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:20 PM
Apr 2020

...and they are also densely populated, so they have two strikes against them. In California, there were complaints that San Francisco overreacted when it instituted a stay at home order so early, but it turned out to be a literal life saver.

Of course, Florida and Texas are the real head scratchers. They have a lot of lead time to see what is going on, but have been slow to act.

jimfields33

(15,642 posts)
7. We keep waiting for something in Florida but nothing does
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:49 PM
Apr 2020

I know this is controversial but I swear we had it in November and December. So many were down hard. We even had a death in my neighborhood. They called it lung damage or something. Again anecdotal but it seems odd that we are spared now. And yes it could still come but our two weeks is fast approaching.

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,488 posts)
4. I think poverty is another important factor in addition to your three.
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:12 PM
Apr 2020

Across the globe, the most dangerous conditions seem to be a combination of poverty and high proximity in housing, and of course poor health care systems (which seems to accompany poverty).

But key to your OP title is this: Republicans cannot govern. You cannot govern that which you're trying to destroy.

localroger

(3,617 posts)
5. We are fortunate to have John Bel Edwards at the helm in Louisiana
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:20 PM
Apr 2020

Despite being an otherwise blood-red state. There was some delay because it was such a drastic thing to contemplate shutting down our tourist industry at the start of the incredibly popular and lucrative Spring festival season, but Edwards did it pretty quickly despite much outrage, and now it's clear that was the correct decision. Our numbers are starting to flatten just as all those places that took it for granted are watching it take off like a skyrocket.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic governors are ...