General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNikki Haley signs on to Mitch McConnell's "Let them eat cake." plan.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/04/nikki-haley-endorses-letting-state-governments-go-bankrupt-and-it-immediately-blows-up-in-her-face/Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley on Thursday gave a thumbs-up to Sen. Mitch McConnells (R-KY) plan to let state governments go bankrupt and he was instantly met with furious blowback from many of her Twitter followers.
States should always plan for a rainy day just like any business, Haley wrote. I disagree that states should take Fed money or be bailed out. This will lead to taxpayers paying for mismanagement of poorly run states. States need to tighten up, make some cuts, and manage.
Republicans just can't help making things worse. Trump has addled their brains.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,832 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)If you look only at the first measurehow much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxesother states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax. This bar chart, made from WalletHub's data, reveals the sharp discrepancies among states on that measure.
South Carolina is the ultimate beggar state.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,832 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)madaboutharry
(40,204 posts)What a vile thing to believe.
spanone
(135,816 posts)let's keep it that way
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)Other than the state congress. She was never a US Congresswoman. She was a governor, and a horrible one, at that. Not that the asshole who replaced her is any better. But, yes. We are all fortunate that she no longer holds any office.
Celerity
(43,299 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)That GIF...
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)modicum of respectability on SOME topics (she was for removing the Confederate flag), but she sure has shitted herself up. Now, she has thrown in with the worst Republicans there are. I don't see why she is doing this. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
leftieNanner
(15,080 posts)For Trump's VP spot.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)the election.
Grins
(7,205 posts)She and the Wasilla Wahabist were BFFs back in the day...
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)She only was "for it" after a bunch of people got massacred in a church over it. She happily let it fly throughout her first term, and into her second. She only changed her mind because leaving it up after a mass-killing would make her look bad. She had no choice at that point. She's a fraud and a political opportunist. Always has been.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)That's not a good place to be and it's damned near impossible to get OFF the list.
Just sayin'.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)It has the same rule too. She's on it now too. I cannot get over how people are falling all over themselves to kiss that overgrown, narcissistic, spoiled brat's ass.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)for a rainy day then. According to her statement.
So...the airlines, for example, should have to give all that money back.
Because, obviously, they didn't plan for this "rainy " day.
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,667 posts)if the states bleeding out were Kentucky, South carolina and Nebraska, what would they be saying, exactly
She is as souless as they rest of them .....
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)It's LONG past time to dispel the idea that she is anything other than a typical Republican hack scumbag, and not some sort of competent party savior. I say that as someone who lives in the poorly-run shithole state she once governed. It was a huge, mismanaged shithole back then, too. She was a horrible governor, and she's as corrupt as they come. She can take her "poorly run states" projection bullshit and shove it up her filthy, little ass.
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)buying back their own stock shouldn't have rainy day funds?
Celerity
(43,299 posts)some of it from previous 'bailout' monies or tax breaks
BOEING, AIRLINES, UNDER FIRE FOR $90 BILLION IN SHARE BUYBACKS, STOKE CONTROVERSY WITH BAILOUT PLEAS FOR AT LEAST $110 BILLION
https://www.newsweek.com/boeing-airlines-under-fire-90-billion-share-buybacks-stoke-controversy-bailout-pleas-least-1493934
Boeing and major U.S. airline companies, having spent more than $90 billion buying shares in the past decade, now need a government bailout of at least $110 billion to survive a recession triggered by the coronavirus pandemic, and probably much more. The scale of the bailout, as projected by most of the eight analysts who spoke to Newsweek, is likely to stoke a growing political controversy over share buybacks in which companies transfer cash to stockholders instead of building up reserves or investing in their business.
Boeing, which has been struggling for the past year with the safety of its 737 Max jet, has spent over $43 billion buying back stock over the past decade. The six airlinesSouthwest Airlines, Alaska Air, Delta Airlines, United Airlines, American Airlines and JetBluehave spent about $47 billion over the same period. American Airlines paid the most to investors at nearly $13 billion, and Alaska Air, the least at less than $1.6 billion.
All seven companies have seen their shares pummeled by news of travel bans and other restrictions imposed by federal and state governments to curtail the spread of COVID-19, a deadly respiratory disease that has overwhelmed hospitals in Europe with critically ill patients.
Six of the seven companies have seen their shares slump more than 60 percent this year, twice as fast as the S&P 500, which has dropped 30 percent. Southwest, the best performing stock in the group, fell 37 percent. Boeing's problems are bigger and it has asked the government for a $60 billion bailout of the aerospace industry. Christopher Harrow, CEO of International Aviation HQ, told Newsweek that the airplane maker alone will need up to $75 billion to save it in its entirety.
snip
Boeing Poisons Flight Attendants
https://stephaniemcmillan.org/boeing-poisons-flight-attendants/