Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUS asks for supplemental briefing about whether battle over Trump financial records ...
NEW: #SCOTUS doesn't grant new cases, but asks for supplemental briefing about whether battle over Trump financial records presents "political question" courts should stay out of. Arguments scheduled for May 12
Link to tweet
No #SCOTUS cert grants this morning, but there's an interesting order in Trump v. Mazars & Trump v. Deutsche Bank: "supplemental letter briefs addressing whether the political question doctrine or related justiciability principles bear on the Courts adjudication of these cases."
Link to tweet
{edited to add:}
SarcasmHat Retweeted
What does this mean? Perhaps that some justices think the courts should neither enforce nor obstruct the subpoenas. This would be an interesting way for Trump to lose, for I doubt Mazars or DB would deny Congress, though WH might.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1292 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS asks for supplemental briefing about whether battle over Trump financial records ... (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2020
OP
Conservatives looking to tighten the scews on the hook they'll hang hat on. n/t
rzemanfl
Apr 2020
#1
Even if accept (I don't) sitting pres can't be indicted, that doesn't stop oversight & investigation
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2020
#2
Supreme Court requires additional briefing on whether it has authority to settle Trump's fight
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2020
#7
rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)1. Conservatives looking to tighten the scews on the hook they'll hang hat on. n/t
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,961 posts)2. Even if accept (I don't) sitting pres can't be indicted, that doesn't stop oversight & investigation
sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)3. Looks like SCOTUS wants to say courts can't enforce Congressional
oversight, so Congress will have no way to enforce subpoenas.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)4. Mazars USA, the accounting firm that has Trump's tax working papers..
..has already said that they will turn over the documents if ordered to do so by the courts. (They were sent the subpoenas, not Trump.) They have no choice since there is no CPA-client privilege rule, with the exception of some situations that don't apply here. (They're the US office of a large global accounting firm headquartered in France.)
rso
(2,267 posts)5. Trump taxes
Since an Appellate Court already ruled in favor of release, if SCOTUS does not take the case, the taxes must be released.
Bayard
(22,011 posts)6. If they uphold the law
Its pretty clear--Congressional oversight can demand the tax returns of ANY citizen, including the president, and for any reason. Doesn't matter if its political or not.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,307 posts)7. Supreme Court requires additional briefing on whether it has authority to settle Trump's fight
Supreme Court requires additional briefing on whether it has authority to settle Trumps fight with Congress over his finances
Link to tweet