Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Mon May 4, 2020, 03:50 PM May 2020

WaPo confirms: A draft government report projects covid-19 cases will surge to about 200,000 per day



Draft report predicts covid-19 cases will reach 200,000 a day by June 1

A draft government report projects covid-19 cases will surge to about 200,000 per day by June 1, a staggering jump that would be accompanied by more than 3,000 deaths each day.

The document predicts a sharp increase in both cases and deaths beginning about May 14, according to a copy shared with The Washington Post. The forecast stops at June 1, but shows both daily cases and deaths on an upward trajectory at that point.

The White House and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quickly disavowed the report, though the slides carry the CDC’s logo. The creator of the model said the numbers are unfinished projections shown to the CDC as a work in progress.

The work contained a wide range of possibilities and modeling was not complete, according to Justin Lessler, an associate professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, who created the model.

More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/government-report-predicts-covid-19-cases-will-reach-200000-a-day-by-june-1/2020/05/04/02fe743e-8e27-11ea-a9c0-73b93422d691_story.html
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo confirms: A draft government report projects covid-19 cases will surge to about 200,000 per day (Original Post) MelissaB May 2020 OP
An influential model often cited WH will revise its projections to nearly 135,000 Covid-19 deaths in MelissaB May 2020 #1
We are totally fucked. Voltaire2 May 2020 #2
+200,000 (a day) SoonerPride May 2020 #4
Statistically though, one expects that a large segment of the deaths will involve... NNadir May 2020 #10
A 7x increase in infections per day but only a 1.5x increase in deaths per day?? SoonerPride May 2020 #3
I wondered about that myself genxlib May 2020 #11
It's the Trump effect C_U_L8R May 2020 #5
You nailed it! BComplex May 2020 #6
That should equal around 10,000 deaths a day. Renew Deal May 2020 #7
Trump is banking on winning the election by bringing the economy back and promising next year Doodley May 2020 #8
Well, Duh. Ms. Toad May 2020 #9
Only 1 thing to do open it all back up. Botany May 2020 #12
Quick, Jared, buy up all the tests and lose them, this way there won't be any new cases. Alex4Martinez May 2020 #13
I have a theory genxlib May 2020 #14
That Seems Right ProfessorGAC May 2020 #16
"White House Rejects Government Report Projecting Rising Coronavirus Death Toll" Alex4Martinez May 2020 #15
-----See page 10 in the report ------ Alex4Martinez May 2020 #17
He DOES NOT CARE! Drahthaardogs May 2020 #18
200,000/day 6,000,000/month rurallib May 2020 #19

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
1. An influential model often cited WH will revise its projections to nearly 135,000 Covid-19 deaths in
Mon May 4, 2020, 03:51 PM
May 2020
An influential model often cited WH will revise its projections to nearly 135,000 Covid-19 deaths in the United States, an increase that one of its researchers tied to relaxed social distancing and increased mobility. It had predicted 72,433 deaths.


NNadir

(33,449 posts)
10. Statistically though, one expects that a large segment of the deaths will involve...
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:06 PM
May 2020

...people like this guy in the "Blue Lives Really Don't Matter" squad:



It is a shame that these types will be disease vectors, and may sicken people who are, um, human beings instead of being racist apes, but the Darwin award exists for a reason.

I hate to be cold, but it's a reality. Live by the big mouth, die by the big mouth.

SoonerPride

(12,286 posts)
3. A 7x increase in infections per day but only a 1.5x increase in deaths per day??
Mon May 4, 2020, 03:52 PM
May 2020

We have anywhere from 25,000-30,000 new infections per day now. So 200,000 is roughly 7x that amount.

And we have been averaging 2,000 MOL deaths per day.

Even their math seems overly optimistic with only 3,000 deaths per day.

genxlib

(5,517 posts)
11. I wondered about that myself
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:09 PM
May 2020

That math only works if we are capturing all of those asymptomatic and mild cases that we were previously missing.

And I do mean ALL of them.

I don't think that we have shown the capacity or the will to do that level of testing.

Or perhaps, the study meant actual cases and not just confirmed cases. That would make a lot more sense.

BComplex

(8,015 posts)
6. You nailed it!
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:00 PM
May 2020

This is the USA under total republican rule (white house, justice department, senate).

Doodley

(9,026 posts)
8. Trump is banking on winning the election by bringing the economy back and promising next year
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:03 PM
May 2020

will be "tremendous." He doesn't think the number of cases or the death toll matter as much.

Ms. Toad

(33,977 posts)
9. Well, Duh.
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:05 PM
May 2020

Ohio started with 1 case when it started shut-down measures - and here we are at ~20,500.

So do they really think the exponential math works differently when you start with 20,500, instead of 1?????

The # of cases in every jurisdiction vastly exceeds the number of cases that justified shutting down in the first place. Reopening the country before we have the capability to trace infections and isolate is asinine.

Botany

(70,429 posts)
12. Only 1 thing to do open it all back up.
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:11 PM
May 2020

So long, it's been good to know ya
So long, it's been good to know ya
So long, it's been good to know ya
What a long time since I've been home
And I've gotta be driftin' along

I've sung this song, but I'll sing it again
Of the people I've met and the places I've seen
Some of the troubles that bothered my mind
And a lot of good people that I've left behind, singing

So long, it's been good to know ya
So long, it's been good to know ya
So long, it's been good to know ya
What a long time since I've been home
And I've gotta be driftin' along

Alex4Martinez

(2,191 posts)
13. Quick, Jared, buy up all the tests and lose them, this way there won't be any new cases.
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:12 PM
May 2020

Then blame Obama.

genxlib

(5,517 posts)
14. I have a theory
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:14 PM
May 2020

That they mean real cases and not just tested and confirmed cases.

We all know the real prevalence of the virus has been way beyond the confirmed cases due to a limited testing.

It's the only way the math works. If they were counting new confirmed cases, the number of deaths would be way higher as noted elsewhere here.

ProfessorGAC

(64,801 posts)
16. That Seems Right
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:18 PM
May 2020

Either that, or they are including a notion that mass testing will kick in.
That would make the math work, too, but seems unlikely.

Alex4Martinez

(2,191 posts)
17. -----See page 10 in the report ------
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:22 PM
May 2020

Here:

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6926-mayhhsbriefing/af7319f4a55fd0ce5dc9/optimized/full.pdf#page=10

Note the red zones of projected new cases, then follow the vertical lines up from the x-axis for 2020-05-15 and 2020-06-1 and you'll see that the projected daily cases are beginning to rise dramatically.

This is NOT a flattened curve.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo confirms: A draft go...