Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cuomo : Most new hospitalizations are people staying at home.. (Original Post) helpisontheway May 2020 OP
No additional comment? greenjar_01 May 2020 #1
I heard this, hit me like a brick ... just damn. uponit7771 May 2020 #2
Most people are staying home jberryhill May 2020 #9
If half that number is true its still a gut punch uponit7771 May 2020 #21
Just keep doing what you're doing jberryhill May 2020 #37
whoa!!! CatWoman May 2020 #3
I would like to see to see more data NJCher May 2020 #4
Excellent point... FarPoint May 2020 #19
The only sense I can make of it is that some people are vastly more susceptible than others. milestogo May 2020 #5
No. You aren't Caliman73 May 2020 #6
+1 jberryhill May 2020 #13
Panic Room? Caliman73 May 2020 #24
"home" doesn't mean only those who have been super-vigilent unblock May 2020 #7
It means social distancing is working in NY Loki Liesmith May 2020 #8
Ding, ding, ding jberryhill May 2020 #10
This was limited to NEW hospitalizations Sanity Claws May 2020 #11
Based on the article I'd guess that the people staying home are being infected... PoliticAverse May 2020 #12
There's a home not far from me where a grandmother lives. cwydro May 2020 #23
He said "Mostly staying home" MacKasey May 2020 #14
And if she can't breathe through one when she is healthy, how is she going breathe through one LisaL May 2020 #31
To me, it is because of the poor education on how the virus spreads Jarqui May 2020 #15
I heard about the virus being in eyes I'm embarrassed helpisontheway May 2020 #26
Please do not be too embarrassed Jarqui May 2020 #29
The virus is definitely in the eyes. LisaL May 2020 #32
If people who are 'truly' staying home are getting sick... WePurrsevere May 2020 #16
I am largely staying home, but when I venture out, I do notice that many Squinch May 2020 #17
Everything that you pointed out is what I see people doing. Blue_true May 2020 #18
One woman I read about went out one time to the leftyladyfrommo May 2020 #20
I even put hand sanitizer on my gloves jberryhill May 2020 #22
Who called her and told her she got what from the keypad? cwydro May 2020 #27
And how would anyone know what she got it from? LisaL May 2020 #33
don't underestimate the power of contact tracing. uncle ray May 2020 #34
A lot of people are ordering food in, not sure if they are wiping down all containers when they come vsrazdem May 2020 #25
Our social distancing is like a block party spinbaby May 2020 #28
This is going to get so spun by the right wing eleny May 2020 #30
That article is extremely misleading - Ms. Toad May 2020 #35
It's nothing complicated BGBD May 2020 #36
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. Most people are staying home
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:28 PM
May 2020

This is like when you hear something like the people affected by "X" are 55% white, 30% African American, and the rest "other".

A statistic like that, while it can be true, is superficially misleading. Because you have to consider numbers like that against the proportions of the categories. If "30%" of anything is African American, then it is having a hugely disproportionate impact on African Americans, who are only in the mid-teens as a percentage of population in the first place.

So if people affected by "X" are 55% white and 30% African American, the impact on whites is lower than on African Americans. If it were equal, you'd expect something around 60% or so and something 14% or so.

It's not clear what "staying home" really means as a category. I've been home since March 8, but have gone for groceries twice.

I'm not convinced that "staying home" is useful as a category.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
37. Just keep doing what you're doing
Thu May 7, 2020, 08:19 AM
May 2020

What you’re doing is working.

You’re going to get through this.

NJCher

(35,650 posts)
4. I would like to see to see more data
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:22 PM
May 2020

Last edited Wed May 6, 2020, 06:34 PM - Edit history (3)

for example, did the people staying at home live with others?

Did they clean all incoming grocery items?

Do they live near medical complexes and have homes nearby where there are leafblowers used?

We need more info.

Now, here is one thing that it probably is not: getting infection from being on an elevator. Our local NPR had an elevator engineer on this a.m. and he told about how elevator air is refreshed, both naturally from downdrafts and through how they are engineered. It is not a likely source of infection.

I hope they do more studies based on this one. I have a feeling we're not getting the full story here, and I'm not implying that Cuomo knows it and isn't telling us. There's some factor that is being overlooked.

Edited to add:

Here is a 3.36" clip where he explains. Spends altogether too much time on the age thing, but whatever. So here are a few other factors I gleaned from watching the clip:

--study was over 3 days and 100 hospitals participated
--Cuomo mentions that visitors to the home were not factored in

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2020/05/06/new-york-gov-andrew-cuomo-says-its-shocking-most-new-coronavirus-cases-were-people-who-stayed-at-home.html

FarPoint

(12,335 posts)
19. Excellent point...
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:05 PM
May 2020

If they are in contact with someone who happened to get exposed....and met with that new victim earlier without a mask for example... didn't wash hands, hugged etc break in technique...there ya go.

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
5. The only sense I can make of it is that some people are vastly more susceptible than others.
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:24 PM
May 2020

We have some idea who is more susceptible, but clearly there is an awful lot we don't know.

We don't know why some people have been infected and have no symptoms and never become sick.

We don't know why some people with very little exposure end up becoming infected and dying.

Edited to add: It may depend on how many people are infected in the surrounding area.

Caliman73

(11,730 posts)
6. No. You aren't
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:25 PM
May 2020

Unless you avoid all contact with any human being, your chances of infection are NOT zero. My family and I have been staying at home, working from home, etc... However, I still go out occasionally to get food and supplies. We have had packages delivered as well. The infection can be at the store or come on a package delivered.

I would imagine with the idiot Trump telling everyone that we should reopen, people have been more lax in their precautions. We all want to hope that it is over and emotion overrides logic. I see it a bit where I am. More cars on the rode, more people out an about, and our local and state leaders have been more cautious.

Caliman73

(11,730 posts)
24. Panic Room?
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:38 PM
May 2020

I don't know. I suppose if we were David Geffen, we could get in our yacht and shelter in place in the Caribbean.

unblock

(52,194 posts)
7. "home" doesn't mean only those who have been super-vigilent
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:28 PM
May 2020

"home" appears to include people who went to protests and beaches and parties and who weren't careful at the grocery store and so on.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
10. Ding, ding, ding
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:30 PM
May 2020

What is the proportion of New Yorkers in the "staying home" category in the first place?

It's unfortunate that this statistic does not have adequate context to evaluate what it means.

Sanity Claws

(21,846 posts)
11. This was limited to NEW hospitalizations
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:30 PM
May 2020

We are a few months into the pandemic. Could this mean that the virus is already very wide spread and the only one susceptible ones left are those who have been at home? By susceptible, I mean people vulnerable to COVID-19. Many people are asymptomatic or have mild to moderate symptoms, not requiring hospitalizations.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
12. Based on the article I'd guess that the people staying home are being infected...
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:30 PM
May 2020

by asymptomatic infected people visiting them at home.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
23. There's a home not far from me where a grandmother lives.
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:18 PM
May 2020

She takes care of three boys...this house has umpteen visitors daily - people of all ages, and a party on Easter Sunday as well.

MacKasey

(986 posts)
14. He said "Mostly staying home"
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:34 PM
May 2020

That means bare minimum they are going out food shopping, if they are not wearing mask and gloves, they are playing Russian roulette.

If other people/family are coming into their house, thinking they are not sick but they are, bam they will get sick

I heard one woman say I can't breathe wearing a mask but if she felt sick she would wear one.

So she does not understand the concept that you can be a carrier and not feel sick

Never underestimate the stupidity of the American public

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
31. And if she can't breathe through one when she is healthy, how is she going breathe through one
Wed May 6, 2020, 08:32 PM
May 2020

if she gets sick? So many people are clueless on how to wear masks anyway. Like has been already pointed out, many people are wearing masks over their mouth but not their nose.

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
15. To me, it is because of the poor education on how the virus spreads
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:37 PM
May 2020

For a long time, they said you do not need masks (trying to protect the supply for medical staff).

But for example, you wear your mask to the store. They have found the virus is thriving in people's eyes. How many people have been told to cover their eyes? The medical staffs have face shields ..
So you come home from shopping and disinfect your groceries. Maybe you even wore gloves. And you were diligent about keeping 6 feet from everyone ... even though they're finding the virus traveling more than twice that distance in the air.
Then you feed the cat and put your feet up to watch TV.
Did you remember to take off your shoes? Because your feet were walking through all the moist exhale on the grocery store floor due to gravity that your cat is about to lie in before you pet her.
Some doctors are suggesting you change your clothes after shopping.

This is a very contagious virus that is easily transmitted.
They could cut down on infections if they would train the public better but Trump is too busy focused on blame, guzzling disinfectants and hurting blue states.

helpisontheway

(5,007 posts)
26. I heard about the virus being in eyes I'm embarrassed
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:38 PM
May 2020

to admit this but I ordered one of the faceshields last night to protect my eyes. I’m not sure if I will have the nerve to wear it if/when I go out(hubby shops for everything). I was mainly thinking about it for when I have to go to the doctor for something. If not, I was thinking of wearing some sort of safety glasses or goggles. No one else seems concerned about eyes.

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
29. Please do not be too embarrassed
Wed May 6, 2020, 07:44 PM
May 2020

We do not fully understand what we are dealing with
Erring on the side of caution - to obtain a face shield - is rational - particularly if you are in a higher risk category as I am.
I've been wearing glasses I do not have to but I too recently got a face shield.

In case we run short on masks - we only have a very few - I also got a respirator for backup. A friend gave me the face shield when I delivered as respirator to him - he's really high risk. With a face shield and that respirator, I'll look like friggin' Darth Vader. I have felt your embarrassment and have not had the nerve. I'd only wear the respirator as a last resort - maybe if I have to go to the hospital.

So you are not alone in your feelings. We didn't cause this virus. We're human and just trying to deal with it as best as we're able. And we do not want to upset others with our appearance.

I was one of the first in our area wearing a mask. I walked into a drug store - everyone kind of freaked out and backed off. The cashier could barely function she was so rattled. If I have to wear the respirator, I know that's a great place to test drive it.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
32. The virus is definitely in the eyes.
Wed May 6, 2020, 08:34 PM
May 2020

So it's a good idea to wear to goggles or at least some glasses. And don't be shy about a face shield.

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
16. If people who are 'truly' staying home are getting sick...
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:37 PM
May 2020

then chances are pretty good that it's coming to them whether on items delivered/brought to them from outside or from someone bringing things to them or visiting when they shouldn't be.

It could also be that they say they've been staying at home but if they go outside for fresh air or go to get groceries or anything else there's a risk. How high that risk is depends on precautions taken of course.

One other SWAG that popped into my head is that maybe they had it before they hunkered down but were asymptomatic. Some time later the beast awakens for round 2 but much worse this time.

Hopefully science figures out what's going on quickly.

The huge problem with this beast is we simply don't know much about it AND apparently it's also been mutating and not in a good way.

Squinch

(50,944 posts)
17. I am largely staying home, but when I venture out, I do notice that many
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:47 PM
May 2020

who are probably also staying home are doing really stupid things...

Masks over mouth but not nose...

Touching everything in the grocery store and then rubbing said nose...

Wearing gloves and thinking that makes them immune... And rubbing their noses...

Not social distancing in parks - hogging a 6 foot wide path by walking side by side and not moving to single file when they pass someone. ..

Careless handling of money...

You really have to be OCD about this. When the virus load in an area becomes high, the virus can be anywhere.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
18. Everything that you pointed out is what I see people doing.
Wed May 6, 2020, 05:58 PM
May 2020

Between people trying but doing things wrong, and the no mask wearers, SAR-COV-2 is having a field day.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,868 posts)
20. One woman I read about went out one time to the
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:08 PM
May 2020

pharmacy. They called and told her she got it from the keypad.

That kind of rattled me. I am almost wearing gloves whenever I do anything outside. I even put hand sanitizer on my gloves. I just went thru the bank drive thru and wore gloves to handle the deposit slips and pen.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
22. I even put hand sanitizer on my gloves
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:16 PM
May 2020

That is indeed what you should be doing.

At best, gloves simply remind you to be mindful of where your hands are. But you should certainly sanitize them - particularly if you are not trained in how to remove them without passing the infection to your hands. And you should wash your hands after you remove them, to be sure.
 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
27. Who called her and told her she got what from the keypad?
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:42 PM
May 2020

You mean a woman had Covid, and a pharmacy called her to tell her she got it from the keypad?

What?

uncle ray

(3,156 posts)
34. don't underestimate the power of contact tracing.
Wed May 6, 2020, 10:58 PM
May 2020

sure, it could be a bogus story, but contact tracing is being done. it's quite likely that someone may have identified a pharmacy as a last stop before visiting the ED. anyone who used the keypad in the period after that person visited could be identified through the pharmacy's transaction history. so it's completely plausible.

vsrazdem

(2,177 posts)
25. A lot of people are ordering food in, not sure if they are wiping down all containers when they come
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:38 PM
May 2020

in or any packages they get delivered. I do this, but I occasionally I find myself getting a little lax on the inside packages when I take them out of the boxes. I don't think this is that surprising. This little bugger virus is finding any way it can to live on.

spinbaby

(15,088 posts)
28. Our social distancing is like a block party
Wed May 6, 2020, 06:56 PM
May 2020

Nothing like Italy or China. I know people who think they’re social distancing, but keep visiting with family, brag that they’ve found a place to get a haircut, get takeout every day, “need” to go to Walmart several times a week, and on and on. One woman I know has kids with different fathers and each kid goes to visit daddy and daddy’s family every week. No clue and we’re in one of those states that’s supposedly shut down.

Ms. Toad

(34,060 posts)
35. That article is extremely misleading -
Wed May 6, 2020, 11:10 PM
May 2020

The chart from which most of the numbers in the article are taken is not a chart of what people were doing - it's a chart of where people were living immediately prior to being hospitalized. Even people who are blatantly ignoring the stay-at-home orders generally live at home and would be included in the 66% being described in the article as as "not venturing much outside."

There is a paragraph of different numbers later - but no indication of where they came from, so no way to know what they mean.

 

BGBD

(3,282 posts)
36. It's nothing complicated
Wed May 6, 2020, 11:28 PM
May 2020

Viruses aren't magic. You have to be exposed to have a chance to get it. If somebody is "staying at home" and still gets it, then it means either they left the house and were exposed or someone came into the house and exposed them that way.

There could be some small percentage who were exposed by someone adjacent to them in their apartment building or something, but it's a small number.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cuomo : Most new hospital...