General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums10-4: How to Reopen the Economy by Exploiting the Coronavirus's Weak Spot
New York TimesIf we cannot resume economic activity without causing a resurgence of Covid-19 infections, we face a grim, unpredictable future of opening and closing schools and businesses.
We can find a way out of this dilemma by exploiting a key property of the virus: its latent period the three-day delay on average between the time a person is infected and the time he or she can infect others.
People can work in two-week cycles, on the job for four days then, by the time they might become infectious, 10 days at home in lockdown. The strategy works even better when the population is split into two groups of households working alternating weeks.
Austrian school officials will adopt a simple version with two groups of students attending school for five days every two weeks starting May 18.
ProfessorGAC
(64,971 posts)Probably worth trying. We can't keep everything down forever.
Calculating and mitigating risk seems wise.
Hugin
(33,112 posts)We can barely get people to wash their hands once a day and wear a mask without them going all AK-47.
Then, there's the haircuts.
JI7
(89,244 posts)and coordinate efforts to fight this since we have nothing at the national level that is trying to do it.
uponit7771
(90,329 posts)Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)societies within one nation.
So the idiocracy/jesusland people can all not wash their fucking hands after they shit, or whatever it is their freedumbs and their looney-toon gods demand of them.
The sane people can do sane things as best they can, avoiding the gun humping nazis for jesus as much as possible.
Hugin
(33,112 posts)Last edited Mon May 11, 2020, 10:11 AM - Edit history (1)
But, I'll put out there for potential use by some future sciency civilization.
"Don't get trapped in a pandemic within a nation that has whistled past an elementary school mass shooting."
This replaces, "Cardio" as #1... BTW.
MissB
(15,805 posts)They may have to adopt something like that for the fall term.
Hugin
(33,112 posts)Very few of them physically attend classes these days, anyway.
Most of the lectures and assignments are available online. So, the transition to full virtual is a short step away.
The biggest problems with the university setting are the dormitory living and, of course, athletics.
MissB
(15,805 posts)(One grad school, one senior in college)
It is hard to duplicate hands on classes though. I have two engineering students; labs and group projects just stopped for spring term.
Nursing students, for example, really need to be hands on.
My youngest kids university is talking about how classrooms will be set up for fall, including putting small classes in larger rooms, rotating very large classes through a combo of some students in class and some virtual so all get to be in class at some point (which frankly sounds a lot like the articles suggestion) and prescribed entrance/exit procedures.
Itll be interesting to see how they deal with dorms. Its going to be tough.
Hugin
(33,112 posts)Because, those are the settings where students learn to think, gain experience, and cooperatively solve problems.
Not sure how to solve that quandary.
However, the communal living and mass socializing situation is a larger and important life issue that society needs to work through.
csziggy
(34,135 posts)A girl I know is in Pre-Med. She had two lab classes for this summer and a biochemistry class. She can't do the labs virtually and she really needs her study group to get through biochem. So, instead of getting the classes this summer, she got a job involving her other interest - horses.
I think it will be good for her. She's been going to college year round since she started. Going into her final year, having a summer off will good for her, especially if she gets into med school afterwards.
uponit7771
(90,329 posts)... relative Rube Goldberg machines when it comes to getting Americans feeling safe.
genxlib
(5,524 posts)uponit7771
(90,329 posts)genxlib
(5,524 posts)I certainly agree but I don't think that it is feasible at the current rate of infection even if we were prepared (which we aren't). It's just too many people infected with exponential touch points for each one.
One of the major purposes of staying in lock down longer is to lower the case load to a point where individual cases can be traced.
intheflow
(28,460 posts)...and thanks. I'd never heard that one before.
Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)it is mind boggling. decades of epidemic best practices ignored.
uponit7771
(90,329 posts)MissB
(15,805 posts)With testing and tracing. It also notes that in the US, widespread testing and tracing is not available and that in many countries there will never be the capability for testing/tracing.
It isnt a US centric article.
uponit7771
(90,329 posts)... Trump doesn't want it not that its not available to have quickly.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-says-too-much-coronavirus-testing-makes-us-look-bad-2020-5
"So the media likes to say we have the most cases, but we do, by far, the most testing. If we did very little testing, we wouldn't have the most cases. So, in a way, by doing all of this testing, we make ourselves look bad," Trump said during a meeting with Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds.
I don't agree with the article that'll no country can test or trace, that doesn't make sense.
Chainfire
(17,523 posts)Someone on their "off" period is infected three days before the end of their returning to work. They go back to work and infect everyone around them.
If lockdowns were enforced and effective, we would not have a million infected Americans today.
SKKY
(11,802 posts)...but it could most definitely work if individual businesses took a look at it. And in looking at some of the comments, I don't get the reluctance to try something. We can't stay in lock-down forever. If this is something that will help us get to a treatment, or a a vaccine, with as few deaths as possible, why not look at it? What do we have to lose?
quaint
(2,560 posts)Maybe they aren't certain.