Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI've blocked off the day to listen to the Supreme Court Justices
Last edited Tue May 12, 2020, 08:24 AM - Edit history (3)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/12/us-supreme-court-trump-tax-returns<snip>
The US supreme court is in its second week of working by telephone during the coronavirus pandemic. On Tuesday it will hear the highest-profile arguments so far presented remotely: regarding the release, or not, of Donald Trumps tax returns.
When Trump ran for president in 2016, he bucked tradition by refusing to release such information. Saying he was under audit, which would not in fact have precluded action, he promised to release his returns in due course. He has not.
Details of the presidents tax affairs have been reported by various outlets, the New York Times winning a Pulitzer in 2019 for a wide-ranging investigation which the prize committee said debunked [Trumps] claims of self-made wealth and revealed a business empire riddled with tax dodges.
But Trumps taxes remain one of the most tantalising mysteries in American politics.
On Tuesday, the supreme court will hear cases originating in Congress and New York state. Both seek records from Mazars USA, Trumps accountants.
Democrats, who control the House of Representatives, want access to the Republican presidents tax returns, records and financial statements, to see if he is violating constitutional safeguards and federal ethics laws by benefiting financially from his occupation of the White House via his business empire.
The New York prosecutor Cyrus Vance Jr wants to know more about Trumps payoffs to women who claimed affairs with him, and whether such hush money payments involved the falsification of business records.------------------
Get your snacks
OK it starts at 10.00am but Ari will have live coverage from noon.
Will find a link where we can listen from 10.00am.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213426766
NPR link here https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213426701
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 759 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I've blocked off the day to listen to the Supreme Court Justices (Original Post)
malaise
May 2020
OP
This case has nothing to do with Trump RELEASING his tax returns to the public...
brooklynite
May 2020
#5
rurallib
(62,387 posts)1. What time and how do we listen?
maybe I missed it in the article?
Is scotusblog carrying it?
malaise
(268,713 posts)2. It's actually afternoon - not sure if it's noon or 1.00pm ET
rurallib
(62,387 posts)4. thank you very much!
If I remember my SCOTUS stuff, each side gets an hour to argue their side.
harumph
(1,893 posts)3. I don't trust Vance Jr.
brooklynite
(94,359 posts)5. This case has nothing to do with Trump RELEASING his tax returns to the public...
...nor should it. Whatever you think about "tradition" (which FWIW only dates back to the 70s), nobody has the "right" to see someone else's tax returns. This case has to do with the State's right to see tax returns as a matter of legal investigation, and compliance with existing Federal Law.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)6. Post updates.
Malaise's Official Trump Taxes, Supreme Court Adventure Thread .
demmiblue
(36,823 posts)7. OMG, RBG asked why this is different than Whitewater, where subpoenas against President could be...
OMG, RBG asked why this is different than Whitewater, where subpoenas against President could be enforced -- "what's good for the goose is good for the gander."
President's lawyers: We don't think you should look at those cases because they are too recent.
President's lawyers: We don't think you should look at those cases because they are too recent.
Link to tweet