Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump signs order that could punish social media companies for how they police content, drawing crit
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/05/28/trump-social-media-executive-order/
By Tony Romm
May 28, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. EDT
President Trump on Thursday signed an executive order that could open the door for federal regulators to punish Facebook, Google and Twitter for the way they police content online, issuing a major broadside against Silicon Valley that quickly triggered wide-ranging political opposition and threats of a legal challenge.
Trump has portrayed the order, the early details of which were first reported by The Washington Post late Wednesday, as an attempt to stamp out political bias on the part of the countrys largest social media platforms. His directive comes days after Twitter steered viewers of some of the presidents tweets to news articles that fact-checked his claims, a move Trump said was a form of censorship.
Were here today to defend free speech from one of the greatest dangers, Trump said before signing the document.
But advocates for the tech sector, lawmakers in Congress and a variety of legal experts from across the political spectrum Thursday doubted the legality of Trumps draft proposal and feared its implications for free speech. Others questioned whether the U.S. government even could carry out the order as the president intended. Some in the tech industry even began quietly discussing their legal options, including a potential lawsuit challenging Trumps order once it is signed, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because talks are early.
<snip>
Trumps order would pave the way for U.S. agencies to revisit and potentially undo long-standing legal protections known as Section 230, which spares tech giants from being held liable for the content they allow online and their own moderation decisions. The directive specifically could open the door for the Federal Communications Commission to rethink the scope of the law, the people familiar with the document said. A change could have dramatic free-speech implications and wide-ranging consequences for a broad swath of companies reliant on doing business on the Internet.
The order also may channel complaints about political bias to the Federal Trade Commission, which would be encouraged to probe whether tech companies content-moderation policies are in keeping with their pledges of neutrality. It further creates a council along with state attorneys general to probe allegations of political bias, while tasking federal agencies with reviewing their spending on social media advertising, according to the people familiar with the White Houses thinking.
</snip>
By Tony Romm
May 28, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. EDT
President Trump on Thursday signed an executive order that could open the door for federal regulators to punish Facebook, Google and Twitter for the way they police content online, issuing a major broadside against Silicon Valley that quickly triggered wide-ranging political opposition and threats of a legal challenge.
Trump has portrayed the order, the early details of which were first reported by The Washington Post late Wednesday, as an attempt to stamp out political bias on the part of the countrys largest social media platforms. His directive comes days after Twitter steered viewers of some of the presidents tweets to news articles that fact-checked his claims, a move Trump said was a form of censorship.
Were here today to defend free speech from one of the greatest dangers, Trump said before signing the document.
But advocates for the tech sector, lawmakers in Congress and a variety of legal experts from across the political spectrum Thursday doubted the legality of Trumps draft proposal and feared its implications for free speech. Others questioned whether the U.S. government even could carry out the order as the president intended. Some in the tech industry even began quietly discussing their legal options, including a potential lawsuit challenging Trumps order once it is signed, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because talks are early.
<snip>
Trumps order would pave the way for U.S. agencies to revisit and potentially undo long-standing legal protections known as Section 230, which spares tech giants from being held liable for the content they allow online and their own moderation decisions. The directive specifically could open the door for the Federal Communications Commission to rethink the scope of the law, the people familiar with the document said. A change could have dramatic free-speech implications and wide-ranging consequences for a broad swath of companies reliant on doing business on the Internet.
The order also may channel complaints about political bias to the Federal Trade Commission, which would be encouraged to probe whether tech companies content-moderation policies are in keeping with their pledges of neutrality. It further creates a council along with state attorneys general to probe allegations of political bias, while tasking federal agencies with reviewing their spending on social media advertising, according to the people familiar with the White Houses thinking.
</snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 890 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump signs order that could punish social media companies for how they police content, drawing crit (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
May 2020
OP
underpants
(182,603 posts)1. Bias? Stop lying. Stop with your complete BS.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)2. K and R😔
Bengus81
(6,928 posts)3. Republicans and Guberment right square in the middle of "peoples lives"
Twitter isn't a part of the GD Guberment, they can make the rules for THEIR website they want just like on DU. You don't like em...hit the road.
Take that fat FUCK to the mat and to the Supreme Court. Hell, start a GO Fund Me for the legal funds, I'll donate.
world wide wally
(21,738 posts)4. And how should they handle lies?
(crickets)
Walleye
(30,977 posts)5. I don't think he knows the definition of censorship
As well as many other words. Government censors. Private companies edit.
Cha
(296,846 posts)6. Is this why Zucker was Sucking up to BLOTUS?
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)7. K&R AND here we go...
moondust
(19,958 posts)8. What about "alternative facts"?
Isn't that all Twitter was doing to his BS posts? They didn't do anything to affect his "freedom of speech."
Right, Kellyanne?
Tarc
(10,472 posts)9. Donald Trump's executive order is 'plainly illegal,' says co-author of Section 230