Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Boojatta

(12,231 posts)
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 06:29 PM Jan 2012

Politics is a popularity contest, and the losers might have something positive to contribute

There's a House of Representatives and a Senate. That's two spaces. Why not add a third space? I mean a space for people who, like most people who vote and like most people who serve on juries, haven't won any election.

Election finance law could specify that, unless a donor specifies otherwise, some of the donated money can be transferred to the third space to pay a salary to a candidate who didn't win and who nevertheless wants to make a political contribution (starting immediately after losing an election) such as by assisting ordinary people who don't know how to communicate with their official, elected representatives.

How many businesses have an opportunity to hire people who previously did enough fundraising to cover the cost of their own wages for the next several years, so that the employer doesn't have any payroll expense? I think that this would be a good deal for taxpayers. What do you think?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politics is a popularity contest, and the losers might have something positive to contribute (Original Post) Boojatta Jan 2012 OP
I think I'll have another beer. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #1
I thought Faux News got all the losers? n/t justgamma Jan 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Politics is a popularity ...