Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 06:40 PM Jan 2012

Most States Find Joining National Sex Offender Database Not Cost-Effective

Most States Find Joining National Sex Offender Database Not Cost-Effective

Less than a third of all U.S. states are complying with the federal law intended to protect children from sex offenders, with most states choosing not to invest in sharing their information with Washington.

Congress adopted the so-called Adam Walsh Act in 2006 that established a national sex offender registry and required states to report the names and locations of convicted child molesters to the federal government. The purpose of the database was to make it more difficult for sex offenders to avoid apprehension by moving from state to state.

To date, only 16 states have signed the law, even though the legislation mandated the entire country do so by 2011. Last year, the Obama administration issued new guidelines to encourage more cooperation from states in implementing the act; the move helped a dozen states become compliant.

Many states continue to view the Adam Walsh Act as an unfunded mandate requiring them to spend millions of dollars to collect sex-offender information, which means using their own limited resources on new equipment, such as technology to gather digital fingerprints, palm prints and DNA.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Most_States_Find_Joining_National_Sex_Offender_Database_Not_Cost_Effective_120108

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most States Find Joining National Sex Offender Database Not Cost-Effective (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
Beyond that, peer-reviewed studies show that the lists are ineffective. Jackpine Radical Jan 2012 #1

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Beyond that, peer-reviewed studies show that the lists are ineffective.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 06:44 PM
Jan 2012

in reducing sex crime rates.

Article available online at:

http://www.rethinking.org.nz/images/newsletter%20PDF/Issue%2078/C%2002%20watchedpot.pdf

Abstract

Despite the fact that the federal and many state governments have enacted registration and community notification laws as a means to better protect communities
from sexual offending, limited empirical research has been conducted to examine
the impact of such legislation on public safety. Therefore, utilizing time-series
analyses, this study examined differences in sexual offense arrest rates before and
after the enactment of New York State’s Sex Offender Registration Act. Results
provide no support for the effectiveness of registration and community notification laws
in reducing sexual offending by: (a) rapists, (b) child molesters, (c) sexual recidivists, or
(d) first-time sex offenders. Analyses also showed that over 95% of all sexual offense
arrests were committed by first-time sex offenders, casting doubt on the ability of laws
that target repeat offenders to meaningfully reduce sexual offending.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Most States Find Joining ...