General Discussion

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts) Tue Sep 1, 2020, 10:23 AM Sep 2020

2nd Circuit Court of Appeals hearing arguments this am re: Dump's financial records

erica orden @eorden (CNN)

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in the Trump v. Vance case at 10 am, the latest step in the extended legal tussle between the president and the Manhattan district attorney's office over his financial records.

8:58 AM · Sep 1, 2020

Link to tweet

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2nd Circuit Court of Appeals hearing arguments this am re: Dump's financial records (Original Post) fleur-de-lisa Sep 2020 OP

They Faux pas Sep 2020 #1

This!👆 SheltieLover Sep 2020 #2

K&R. Is delaying via SCotUS next step, for them to rule *after* the election? UTUSN Sep 2020 #3

SCOTUS has already ruled SoCalNative Sep 2020 #5

Anybody know how this is going? dmr Sep 2020 #4

I haven't heard anything but fleur-de-lisa Sep 2020 #6

I don't see how it would. Of course I'm no legal expert, but dmr Sep 2020 #7

Faux pas

(14,668 posts)

1. They

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Tue Sep 1, 2020, 10:40 AM

Sep 2020

need to stop the effer's reindeer games.

SheltieLover

(57,073 posts)

2. This!👆

Reply to Faux pas (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 1, 2020, 10:43 AM

Sep 2020

UTUSN

(70,684 posts)

3. K&R. Is delaying via SCotUS next step, for them to rule *after* the election?

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Tue Sep 1, 2020, 11:44 AM

Sep 2020

SoCalNative

(4,613 posts)

5. SCOTUS has already ruled

Reply to UTUSN (Reply #3)

Tue Sep 1, 2020, 12:44 PM

Sep 2020

why he is even being allowed to drag this through the courts again is beyond a mystery.

dmr

(28,347 posts)

4. Anybody know how this is going?

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Tue Sep 1, 2020, 12:36 PM

Sep 2020

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

6. I haven't heard anything but

Reply to dmr (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 1, 2020, 12:50 PM

Sep 2020

many legal experts, with direct experience with this judge, were predicting that this would not go in Dump's favor.

dmr

(28,347 posts)

7. I don't see how it would. Of course I'm no legal expert, but

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #6)

Tue Sep 1, 2020, 01:04 PM

Sep 2020

I do have some common sense. He's trying way too hard to hide this. If I were the judge, I'd have nose trouble. I'd rule against him just so I could see what he's hiding.

I'd sure like to know how he's (or who is) paying his legal fees. Seriously. If someone else is paying his legal fees, is that taxable?

He's embroiled in so many legal issues ... i wonder if someone is keeping a score card, lol.

Reply to this discussion