General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy brainwashed cousin now asks this: "Where can I find truthful news?"
What would be your answer? I believe his question is genuine.
He's a retired cop, fully indoctrinated by FOX and by AM hate radio.
If he is beginning to comprehend that he has been deceived, that is a major change, and perhaps signals the same in others.
He is a Coast Guard veteran, and named for his Uncle who was a POW in the Philippines and was our family hero. He is a loving father and grandfather, and a financial success in life.
But he has been brainwashed.
So what news entity might be an easy transition?
marybourg
(12,614 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2020, 08:16 PM - Edit history (1)
TV: PBS Newshour and weekly Washington Week.
cos dem
(903 posts)Get a subscription to NYT, Washington post. Become a subscriber to PBS or NPR. Skip cable news (all of it).
If you're not willing to pay for it, then you don't care about it enough.
brush
(53,764 posts)Maddow, McDonnell, Reid and Keilar are all on cable do excellent jobs of cutting through trump and repug lies. And of course you have to pay for it.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)It can be satisfying if you're already outraged. But if you're an open-minded Republican, they will turn you right off.
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)I pay a lot for CNN through cable. How exactly is that free?
DUgosh
(3,055 posts)marybourg
(12,614 posts)And Ive been listening to them since short-wave radio days. They make many misstatments of fact, and use Democrat where they should be using Democratic.
malaise
(268,910 posts)excellent and I like NPR
Trailrider1951
(3,414 posts)I also like CBS News (cbsnews.com). If he parrots, "liberal bias", point him toward REAL left-wing slanted news: World Socialist Website (WsWs.org). I'm sure he can tell the difference.
marybourg
(12,614 posts)many of England's other cultural institutions.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)Said under oath in a congressional hearing: if you read it in the New York Times or the Washington Post its not fake news.
Reader Rabbit
(2,624 posts)If so, you could get him to read Reuters, Christian Science Monitor, or some other written-word news source that covers a broad spectrumsomething that won't trigger the "liberal media" response. If he's only willing to watch, then perhaps PBS or some other platform where there is only reporting, rather than commentary, a lot MSNBC.
A bland diet of written word media might be more palatable to someone conditioned to Fox and emotion/anger-driven content.
RockRaven
(14,958 posts)commentary or spin. Your relative will still probably interpret them through a right wing nut job lens given his years of indoctrination, but at least all the pertinent facts are included in each article.
Karadeniz
(22,493 posts)Qutzupalotl
(14,300 posts)I also tell them PBS NewsHour so they can see what letting people finish a sentence on TV looks like. I admit its a little boring compared to mortal combat, but it is informative.
I love Rachel too, but shes not for everyone; she focuses on stories of interest to us rather than Republicans. So when I recommend her, I preface it by saying Im a Democrat, so I like what she covers. Admitting ones own preferences or biases builds trust, IMO.
I watch PBS NewsHour. It truly is one of the best news sources. It's not just a blurb here and there or a catchy headline. You get in-depth discussions and the people on there actually act like adults when discussing something.
brush
(53,764 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2020, 08:04 PM - Edit history (1)
An open-minded perhaps soon-to-be-former Republican will not find this place hospitable or persuasive. Not when we have posters calling those on his side repugs, repukes, rethugs, etc.
MenloParque
(512 posts)Many of my conservative colleagues in the IT sector in Silicon Valley read the BBC World News, and Reuters. I dont know why? But, anything is better than Fox. Why are so many right wingers drawn to the IT sector? Ive worked at Intel, nVidia, Apple, Google...each freaking company in this Valley is crawling with conservacucks!!
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Lots of higher executives and engineers are progressive, but many engineers and some executives are not. Most of the skilled low level employees are real knuckle-draggers, maybe because a large contingent are ex low level military. Line workers tend to be highly progressive, with few that are not.
MenloParque
(512 posts)My first gig was a Mechanical Design Engineer at Applied Materials in the mid-80s. Since receiving my PHD at Stanford, I can say the higher levels I reach the more Right wing, Evil, and hateful my colleagues become. These assholes that make 300k or more a year also love expensive Firearms and love gun culture. My worst experience was my stint at Lockheed Martin as a Senior Circuit Design Engineer (my department was full of gun humping wannabe mercenaries). Service techs, less senior engineers, assembly workers are usually liberal and come from China, India, and the Philippines- loving and beautiful people. I cant wait to retire and tend to my garden.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)NOT Faux, except their polling.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)I turned a coworker who was regular Fox News viewer and Rush listener onto NPR years ago, and he never turned back (as far as I know). He became a nicer person too.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)lots of explanation, no rants.
tanyev
(42,544 posts)A comment like "It's so hard to know who to believe these days" is always followed by some right wing conspiracy theory. Mostly it's been Covid related because she thankfully doesn't do much politics on her FB page. I don't know where she's finding this stuff, but I've started wondering if the original text already contains the "don't know who to believe" mantra and she's just copying and pasting all of it.
radius777
(3,635 posts)and they're looking for the 'real news' ie far right conspiracy bullshit.
To the extent that these types move away from the far right some of them simply drift to the far left, which also hates Dems, and what these types all tend to be driven by.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)Ferryboat
(922 posts)Newsfactchecknetwork.com
Mediabiasfactcheck.com
These will help him understand news sources political biases, and stories of the day.
Its a good start to critical thinking.
meadowlander
(4,394 posts)They do the "fair and balanced" "equal time" thing but they don't actively distort the story and their right wing commentators at least have one foot in reality.
nuxvomica
(12,420 posts)What people in right-wing news recovery need is calmness, not histrionics driven by ratings. It's not just the content they need to recover from but the delivery as well and they won't get that relief from MSNBC or CNN. Part of the problem with right-wing news, and cable news in general, is it never gives you the chance to reflect and think things through for yourself. I would also suggest CBS News Sunday Morning.
Mopar151
(9,978 posts)Politics is part of the news, not the object. And, generally, a positive spin on people stories. ABC's overnite team seems ready to pounce on anything they can gin up some anger out of.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)you have to say because it sounds like you are on ball. Most are that are on this sight. I know I ask questions and ask for opinions here.
Be educated. But, that actually takes some time. Back in the day people use to feel it there responsibility to pay attention.
LunaSea
(2,893 posts)Check out foreign papers as well, it's amazing how much news we DON'T get in the US.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)I read. Though there are people I would say listen too, also now that I think about it. Maddow, Oliver is very good and Seth and Noah. It is an interesting question if someone really wants to know.
lostnfound
(16,171 posts)Today you have to weed through a haystack of disinformation to find the needles of truth.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)they bend over backward to be even-handed, even when they should come out and call Trump a liar.
Looks like he is having doubts about whether Fox and rightwing radio are telling him the truth, that is an opening. If you think that he is otherwise a good guy, tell him that and also tell him that you think that he was misled by the rightwing sources, but dont argue with him. Let facts start to rumble through his head, maybe by voting time he will either sit out of Trump or vote for Joe.
The empressof all
(29,098 posts)Sinclair has bought up a crap load of local stations and have destroyed many previously great local news programs.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Response to Blue_true (Reply #21)
kimbutgar This message was self-deleted by its author.
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)eom
andym
(5,443 posts)BBC , CBC (CBC.ca) might be 2 to consider since they are international (no US political ax to grind) with public funding.
PBS and NPR, which are publicly funded here.
Reuters and AP are more neutral private sources-- really mixed.
Smithsonian Magazine for science.
byronius
(7,392 posts)It's why I know everything first, and get my facts right every time.
Just true. No BS flies on this site for long. If the truth isn't in the OP, it's in the comments.
lostnfound
(16,171 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)DU has information from such a wide variety of sources, accompanied by factchecking and erudite commentary from our very own experts in just about everything, that it's where I've started every day since I became a member.
The empressof all
(29,098 posts)I usually suggest the Christian Science Monitor. But of course that assumes they are willing to read their news. The Monitor isn't my first choice for news but I do check there for a moderate but right leaning perspective. It also helps to add the Christian to the brand for those who are rabidly brainwashed in that direction.
For someone who is ready for a full bore reality check I would go with all the suggestions you all mentioned above.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Even if they dont agree with a position, they factually report what that position is, in a way that allows people to make up their own mind.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)I frequently refer people to Ad Fontes for their media bias charts.
https://www.adfontesmedia.com
https://www.adfontesmedia.com/gallery/
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)NPR has been so damaged by RW characterization.
I might suggest Nightly News.
He's not an evangelical. But he is a retired cop, and feels the Law and Order propaganda very strongly.
erronis
(15,232 posts)Don't trust just one country's source.
Axios is good also but a bit new to evaluate.
NYTimes seems to have too much of an establishment bent - as in how to get access to those in power.
Sometimes even the WSJ has an independent piece of journalism.
I get news feeds (RSS) from many sources, US and foreign. Marcy Wheeler is a favorite.
Google News and other aggregators may be helpful but I worry about their agendas. (Hello, fakebuck.)
Stardust
(3,894 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 9, 2020, 07:20 PM - Edit history (2)
*her show is Democracy Now. I cant say enough good things about FSTV.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)From there move to NPR.
Mz Pip
(27,436 posts)He wants his prejudices and skewed world view validated.
kimbutgar
(21,127 posts)I used to watch only MSNBC but I watch my local news during the day. joy Reid and the two network news they give a pretty fair unbiased report but I have seen the contrast between the two. Also FSTV with Amy Goodman is also good.
Silent3
(15,190 posts)This is not to scare him off, but to point out that people often play the game of pointing to cherry-picked examples of what one news outlet gets wrong as a reason to never trust that outlet about anything ever again, while at the same time being blind to the many flaws of other sources of news.
His job as a consumer of news is to look for logic and reasoning and consistency -- and when I say "consistency", not just internal consistency, but consistency with other sources, with history, with human behavior.
Here's a good book for him (and for everybody else, by the way):
https://www.amazon.com/Skeptics-Guide-Universe-Really-Increasingly/dp/1538760533
Doodley
(9,078 posts)Does their healthcare system have better outcomes? Do the people live longer? Is their education better? Is the gap between rich and poor better? Is their more or less poverty? How many die of gun deaths? What are their crime figures? What is their prison population? Then assess for himself across multiple channels if the reporting of America's problems and possible solutions is accurate.
Kitchari
(2,166 posts)Theguardian.com
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)But it takes some effort. If its someone you care about, it is definitely worth the effort.
He is asking you for help, help him.
First: find common ground. This sets the effort off on a positive tone, and sets the stage for future interaction. Dont yell, scream, belittle or call anyone names, even Trump. This is unnecessary to the task at hand.
How to find common ground: I have found the following a great place to start. Ask him what he wants his tax dollars to fund. National defense, education, taking care of the elderly, sick, and disabled... there will be much common ground here.
Start his re-education by secretly assigning him information to find. This could be some interesting article you saw earlier that day. He will start going looking and find it. Before long, he will be finding things on his own, and bring to you.
You job then: listen, say Oh, I hadnt heard that, Ill check it out. Let him know later what you found out. Dont tell him you saw it on DU, when you logged in at 7am. He is now bringing YOU good information. He gets a good feel, and so do you for helping him!
I tell you this because it worked for me. My husband was a lifelong (Eisenhower) republican, and he has been a rock-solid Democrat since 2008. I am so, so proud of him!
Good luck to you, and your nephew. Hes worth the effort.
I would like to clarify the secret assignments: ask him to find something about something you may know he is interested in...say, you saw an article about Bidens plans for the environment, and nephew is an outdoorsman. You say, does Biden have a good environment plan? Next thing you know, nephew just looked up Biden environmental policies.
Find. Common. Ground.
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)His son-in-law is about to be promoted to GENERAL in the United States Army.
Perhaps Trump's denigration of the military has broken the spell.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)The best news network in the biz right now.
salin
(48,955 posts)and wouldn't likely send him running back to his 'safe place' per rw news.
I also think NPR (despite rw vilification) is a pretty good landing/transition place.
GoCubsGo
(32,079 posts)They lean conservative, but they're fair and accurate. Heck, even the Wall St. Journal--as long as you stay away from the editorial page, is a pretty good source of news. I would say that of the NYT and Washington Post, and most major newspapers.
As for TV, PBS "News Hour" is a good start. If one's local PBS carries the PBS World channel, they also will probably run BBC World News, DW News (Deutsche Welle) out of Germany, and NHK News out of Japan. It's pretty easy to find the CBC out of Canada online, as well.
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)and he should recognize the name of the news source and research its ownership and bias.
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)tell him to look at center, center left, center right and get a balance of perspectives.
hunter
(38,310 posts)... but that's not saying much.
My wife and I read all our news and opinion. We don't have cable or satellite television so maybe we are spending that money on electronic subscriptions to newspapers like the Washington Post instead. I'm always surprised when people talk about their one or two hundred dollar cable television subscriptions. My wife and I get by with an inexpensive DSL internet connection.
I do support our local public radio station but not especially for the news.
Our television plays DVDs and $8.99 a month Netflix. That's pretty much all it does. It's not set up for broadcast television. We can 'cast other stuff to our television from our laptops and my wife's phone, but mostly we don't. We watched the Democratic Convention direct from the source.
We quit traditional television more than a decade ago. Life is more peaceful without it. Traditional television works by making people anxious and selling them stuff they wouldn't otherwise buy, everything from cars to drugs to politicians.
If I'm going to sit down and watch television I might as well watch something entertaining! People have been making movies for more than a century and a lot of it can be streamed. A lot of it is on DVDs. There's always something to watch.
I've noticed my adult children and their cousins don't pay any attention at all to traditional television and radio. They don't have it in their homes. In their cars they listen to music, podcasts, or audio books.
trueblue2007
(17,204 posts)ooky
(8,922 posts)If he thinks he is being deceived, I would probe why he thinks that, and then first direct him to sources for the specific truths he is seeking. Help him get his answers. If he's satisfied with the answers then he is likely to choose on his own to keep returning for his information.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... by taking her fear of welfare fraud seriously and explaining that health care is so expensive, because of our super technological advances that no one can afford it on their own. She decided to vote for Obama.
I would suggest that he concentrate on separating Fox News reporting from Fox News Opinion. The reporting is, actually, fairly OK. Explain to him that CNN and MSNBC also have opinion that is biased and you need to make the distinctions there too.
blm
(113,041 posts)CNN.
lostnfound
(16,171 posts)We need some transition zones for different groups of people. We democrats like our diverse opinions and nuanced arguments, but its probably overwhelming for transitioning republicans. Ive wanted to direct a colleague who had asked for a good news source, and I didnt know what to tell him either.
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)Plain spoken, uncomplicated, no buzz words or spin.
GeoWilliam750
(2,522 posts)misanthrope
(7,411 posts)is that the presentation, production and tone is so similar to what network news was like 40 years ago. There's no crawl at the bottom of the screen, no overload of flashy graphics with sound effects, no constant "Breaking News" slogan flashing, no breathless news personality trying to make it seem as if alien robots with flamethrowers are advancing on their studio and your home simultaneously.
They aren't playing games to boost ratings. They aren't trying to be cute or funny.
It's measured and deliberate, like, Cronkite, Huntley and Brinkley. News by adults, for adults.
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)I haven't watched it for years. Still Judy Woodruff?
misanthrope
(7,411 posts)But the style is all still the same. The part that might do him the most good are watching the Friday opinion segments with Mark Shields and David Brooks. The reason being the collegiality they share while often expressing differing views could show your cousin how sanity and decorum are possible when political opponents show basic human decency and respect toward each other.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)Good Luck!