General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould Woodward have reported Trump's virus revelations sooner? Here's how he defends his decision.
Washington Post articleLink posted here without comment.
JI7
(89,173 posts)MineralMan
(146,192 posts)Tell us what he said.
trueblue2007
(17,138 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)The last interview was completed just over a month ago. Woodward chose to let the idiot keep talkingjust to get more material, but then he cut off the interviews in time to rush his book to press before the election.
From my point of view, criticism of Woodward is overblown in this case.
-Laelth
Thekaspervote
(32,606 posts)Bettie
(15,997 posts)in taking down two corrupt presidents?
uponit7771
(90,225 posts)... stupid assed Trump.
uponit7771
(90,225 posts)... access to Red Don.
That could've been done, Woodward has the connections
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Whatever gets you to sleep at night, Bob. As Charlie Pierce put it: "I have to wonder how Woodward watched the president* lie for six months as the body count ratcheted skyward without his conscience tearing out his heart."
brush
(53,467 posts)interview Woodward had with him a month ago? Woodward cut off the interviews to get the book done before the elections.
We don't know that. Even in February no one knew what was to become 200k deaths.
I have a feeling this is the death knell for trump though. No way to call this "fake news" as Woodward has the receipts/tapes.