General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLots of focus on abortion (and rightfully so) but the ACA is all but dead at this point...
If a conservative justice gets put on the bench in time for oral arguments on the ACA lawsuit (which will be 11/10), it's all but gone. It barely withstood the courts back in 2012 and that was with Roberts siding with the liberal wing. At this point, even if Roberts votes similarly, it's doubtful any other conservative justice will and there won't be enough liberals to save it.
That's if the nominee is confirmed in the next few weeks.
IF it goes to a lame duck session, that nominee won't be approved, likely, before oral arguments begin and then they can't vote (I believe). That means the court remains at 4-4 potentially if Roberts sides with the liberal-wing, therefore there is no ruling. It defaults to the lower court ruling - which overturns it.
So, the ACA is all but gone.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)These should be the first words out of every Dem's mouth! ACA is what got us a Blue Wave in 2018. This is bigger than abortion right now.
Cha
(297,123 posts)2o18 as per advice from Nancy & we had a Democratic House Victory. I think you meant "2018", right?
I imagine our Dems will Make this a Bigger Issue NOW.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)Duh on me! I fixed it (thanks!). The ACA is THE ISSUE. Bernie suggested Biden should go with this big time recently and he is right on this one. The ACA, then jobs (especially now with Covid).
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)dalton99a
(81,433 posts)Which is why the court MUST be expanded
brush
(53,764 posts)with the public option as he has mentioned. The court has no immediate say over what laws are passed by the House and Senate.
The repugs could try to take something through courts but the ACA with the public option might he so popular, they wouldn't dare.
Let's see how this plays out. The polls are holding steady for Biden and if he wins we have a good chance of taking the Senate, especially now with repugs senators with toughr races being put in a position of denying Obama but giving trump a vote on a SCOTUS justice. They don't want to lose their seat.
Qutzupalotl
(14,300 posts)I will grant that some are. But for the most part, conservative justices try to interpret the law as written and take a dim view on giving expansive power to any one branch, including the courts. Liberal justices tend to give people the benefit of the doubt, and favor more expansive individual rights. So its not a direct parallel to Republicans and Democrats. Justices have to seek a justification for their rulings either in the law or in their reasoning. Ideologues will have a harder time justifying their positions if they are not based in law.
So I dont know that its a foregone conclusion that ACA is dead. It all comes down to the arguments, how they are presented, and how the law is written. I think overturning a duly passed law is a high bar, and even conservative justices are reluctant to go that far. Lets see what happens when its argued.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...even if no replacement justice is confirmed, it will still go before an 8-vote Court, 4 of whom already voted to overturn it in 2012 (I'm counting on Kavanaugh and Gorsuch to vote the same as Kennedy and Scalia). Meaning that the best we can hope for is a 4-4 split, in which case the lower-circuit Court of Appeals decision overturning it is upheld.
So, it's "heads, they win - tails, we lose."
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)The immediate impact is the Affordable Care Act, not Roe v. Wade
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)And explain to me why it is a Good Thing that people don't have some kind of basic health care coverage?
Okay, I understand you and I are on the same side here, but this is what I want asked of the anti-choice, anti- health care people every single day.
dchill
(38,465 posts)That's been my experience.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)For one thing, they usually deny the humanity of those who don't subscribe to their narrow set of beliefs. And they assume they can tell everyone else how to behave or what to believe, as if any other belief or ethical systems don't exist.
In reality, non believers tend to behave far more morally than self-described Christians or any other faiths. Which is among the reasons I totally despise most religious people. They have a fundamental lack of understanding that anything outside their own narrow beliefs can possibly be valid or worthwhile.
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)The folks who didn't vote for Hillary because she wasn't pure enough are about to choke on that decision with the rest of us.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)I'm not sure why. But we will get to that at some point.
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)A 6-3 court would overturn it.